On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 09:45:31 GMT, Johan Sjölén <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
>> Please review this PR for fixing JDK-8287281. >> >> If a thread is handshake safe we immediately execute the closure, instead of >> going through the regular Handshake process. >> >> Finally: Should `VirtualThreadGetThreadClosure` and its `do_thread()` body >> be inlined instead? We can do this in this PR, imho, but I'm hoping to get >> some input on this. >> >> >> Passes tier1. Running tier2-5. > > Johan Sjölén has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - do_thread(target) not self > - Remove checks for is_handshake_for, instead call Handshake::execute > - Switch order of handshake check Passed tier1-5. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8992
