On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:30:15 GMT, Rafael Winterhalter
wrote:
>> To allow agents the definition of auxiliary classes, an API is needed to
>> allow this. Currently, this is often achieved by using `sun.misc.Unsafe` or
>> `jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe` ever since the `defineClass` method was removed
and developers) for
> continuing to investigate this issue from their side. Without their
> persistence this issue would have languished.
> . . .
Wow, nice work tracking that one down!
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
it would be to accurately interact with things as
expressed at the source level
- the cost of disabling or reversing the optimisation when needed; and
- the overall cost and complexity it adds to the development and
maintenance of the JVM"
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander
me reason I thought it was in the lib directory with
> LingeredApp. Yes, it's good the way it is.
I'm still happy with this patch to go in after these changes.
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander
the bill while
removing the -Xcomp flag from the command line would not fulfil the
test's remit. If that is the point of the test then I agree,
reluctantly, that your hack is the right solution. On those grounds I'm
happy to accept the patch. However, I'd prefer someone else (And
o, this means the outcome is down to a race
between the bit-rot and the deprecation axe. If bit-rot wins then isn't
that simply the deprecation axe swinging a tad earlier? (i.e. de facto
deprecation rather than de jure :-).
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
Senior Principal Software Enginee
On 18/03/2019 10:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Could I get a review from an OpenJDK Reviewer for this, please? Bob is
> already OK with it.
Yes, this is fine. Reviewed.
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
omulgate the required understanding
beyond mere written words) it is also, as I mention in mye earlier note,
legacy and the ability to interoperate between JDK releases. On the
credit side, I'm not yet convinced that this change achieves an
improvement in security that is not available via other, b
volved in managing the complexity
that that multiplicity implies I am concerned with. I think I probably
speak for Remi here too and, perhaps, others agent implementors. I'd
like to see a much better argument for the security benefits of this
change before it gets rolled into a release.
regards,
A
fix gets revoked thanks, say, to a regression of some sort it's
important to be able to go back and re-read that audit trail.
regards,
Andrew Dinn
---
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directo
ti-pkg.1/
>
>
> The Jdk webrev:
> http://javaweb.sfbay.sun.com/java/svc/ss45998/webrevs/2016/hotspot/8159145-jigsaw-jvmti-pkg.jdk1/
I don't seem to be able to access those webrevs:
Server not found
Firefox can't find the server at javaweb.sfbay.sun.com.
. . .
11 matches
Mail list logo
