Hi!
Please review this very simple serviceability backport to 8u. The only
difference between the JDK 9 changeset and the JDK 8 changeset is that
the ClassLoaderDataGraph::cld_do function was already backported to JDK
8 in the fix for 8049421 [0]. So the changes for adding
classLoaderData.hpp
Hi!
Please review this straightforward serviceability backport to JDK 8.
No real changes to product code. I just moved the import statements in
the DynLibDcmdTest.java test case to below the copyright header.
bug report:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031304
JDK 9 review thread:
h
Hi!
Any love out there for my review request?
Cheers,
-Buck
On 2017/12/15 14:42, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
May I please get a review of the following very simple backport of this
serviceability improvement to JDK 8?
The two hotspot jtreg test cases needed to be modified slightly because
of
Hi!
May I please get a review of the following very simple backport of this
serviceability improvement to JDK 8?
The two hotspot jtreg test cases needed to be modified slightly because
of the lack of dcmd-specific test support in JDK 8's HS code base. The
only non-test difference from the JD
Hi!
Sharath Ballal has identified another minor formatting issue on line 984
of vmStructs.cpp. I have corrected it and uploaded a new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/8181647.2/
I have run the changes through JPRT (default and "hotspot" test sets)
and see no sign of regression.
We
Hi!
Please review my fix for this JMX issue.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133666
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/8133666/
Once approved, I will push this fix into:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt
Cheers,
-Buck
Hi!
Please approve this very simple update to the URL written in the crash
log (hs_err_pid.log) file.
BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8060169
WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbuck/8060169/webrev.000/
Cheers,
-Buck
Changeset: 3f766f58c48a
Author:dbuck
Date: 2013-01-31 10:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/3f766f58c48a
7042126: (alt-rt) HashMap.clone implementation should be re-examined
Summary: Test case for cr7042126. Issue only found in OracleJDK, but test case
is vali
version of the script locally (solaris/SPARC). Rerunning on
JPRT just to make sure all platforms are OK. (I'm a sucker for testing.)
Cheers,
-Buck
On 3/30/2012 12:36 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 3/29/12 9:04 PM, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
I would like to submit a new version of the fi
the feedback.
Cheers,
-Buck
On 3/30/2012 3:20 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 29 mar 2012, at 17:11, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
If the limit is the same for all platforms, then the fix
could be improved to check that each line is smaller than the
limit before to send it to the target JVM, and prope
his value into the
client is just asking for trouble. Ideally, jcmd should be
inter-operable with multiple versions of the JVM.
Thanks for all the feedback. Will rebuild / re-test and get a new
version out ASAP.
Cheers,
-Buck
On 03/29/12 23:29, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Resending... with Dav
"
> if [ "$status" != 0 ]; then
> echo "jcmd command returned non-zero exit code (status=$status). Failed."
Thanks. will change.
> line 54: please redirect output of 'grep' here to /dev/null or the
> appropriate bit bucket...
Thanks, will change as wel
ge like:
"line 84: Line too long"
would improve the user experience.
A few comments on the code:
src/share/classes/sun/tools/jcmd/JCmd.java
Copyright years should be "2011, 2012" instead of "2012"
test/sun/tools/jcmd/dcmd-big-script.txt
The empty line at the end of the
Hi!
Please review my fix for the following bug :
[ Bug ID: 7154822 forward port fix for Bug 13645891 to JDK8 jcmd (1024
byte file size limit issue) ]
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7154822
The issue is there is an arbitrary limit in the size of a script file
you pass to t
Hi Alan!
After looking at the code, I think that not-honoring the timeout would
be a bug. I will fix this and resubmit my review request.
(I also have other changes to make based on Dmitry Samersoff's comment,
so this may take a bit longer before the new version is submitted.
Thanks for the
ecommended to call getsockopt() and
read the SO_ERROR to determine whether connect was successful or not.
-Dmitry
On 2011-08-04 16:02, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
I would like to request that my fix for 7011591 be reviewed for push
into JDK8 (and JDK7u if possible).
CR: 7011591 JDWP socket transport
16 matches
Mail list logo