Per,
On 07.04.2016 14:55, Per Liden wrote:
On 2016-04-07 13:24, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
Hi Per,
The fix looks good, but a couple of suggestions regarding:
Thanks Dima!
GcCapacityTest.java.frames.html
1) -Xmx128 --> -Xmx128m
Ah, thanks for catching that!
2) Remove @ignore 8149
Hi Per,
The fix looks good, but a couple of suggestions regarding:
GcCapacityTest.java.frames.html
1) -Xmx128 --> -Xmx128m
2) Remove @ignore 8149778
Adding -Xmx should fix 8149778 as well.
Thanks,
Dima
On 06.04.2016 12:32, Per Liden wrote:
Summary: This patch updates the tests in servic
On 10.11.2014 20:28, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
On 2014-11-08 09:11, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
Hi Mandy,
On 08.11.2014 02:41, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 11/7/14 3:34 AM, Evgeniya Stepanova wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eistepan/8062536/webrev.02/
What are the valid values ofvm.gc? It's
Hi Mandy,
On 08.11.2014 02:41, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 11/7/14 3:34 AM, Evgeniya Stepanova wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~eistepan/8062536/webrev.02/
What are the valid values ofvm.gc? It's a bit awk for null as a valid
value and I would imagine "*" wildcard may be a better value?
vm.g
Hi Katja,
You are right, there will be no conflict, because test ignores any
external VM flags.
So, adding @requires seems unnecessary here, but...
Ignoring external options is bad thing, such "selfish" tests are not
applicable for other areas, like GC, compiler, RT.
@requires will allow t
be a
separate webrev as they will be located in a separate repository.
Regards,
Staffan
On 08/27/2014 04:08 AM, Dmitry Fazunenko wrote:
Hi Staffan,
Thanks for submitting RFE and implementing it! This event seems to be
used widely.
So it's very important to design it correctly.
May I ask you
Hi Staffan,
Thanks for submitting RFE and implementing it! This event seems to be
used widely.
So it's very important to design it correctly.
May I ask you to provide some extra information:
- format of event
(this could be included in the CR description)
- regression tests for that event wil
