.openjdk.java.net/~jzavgren/8005120/webrev.07/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejzavgren/8005120/webrev.07/>
Thank you!
John Zavgren
john.zavg...@oracle.com
On 12/20/2012 05:47 PM, John Zavgren wrote:
Greetings:
I modified my changes so that windows knows the definition of the POSIX data
On 12/28/2012 10:49 AM, John Zavgren wrote:
Please consider the following webrev for JDK-8005120.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.06/
(I apologize for overlooking an error in the windows code that I created in my
previous release. )
Thanks!
John Zavgren
Greetings:
I modified windows source code files so they pass size_t for buffer
sizes and socklen_t for address structures.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.03/
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks!
On 12/26/2012 02:56 PM, John Zavgren wrote
Greetings:
I modified the windows code so that it uses socklen_t to specify the
lengths of data structures, parameter lengths, etc. instead of ints
(which can be negative.)
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/jzavgren/8005120/webrev.02/
Thanks!
John Zavgren
On 12/20/2012 05:47 PM
1/
Thanks!
John Zavgren
On 20/12/2012 13:49, John Zavgren wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I agree that the "correct" way to fix this problem is to use POSIX data
> types, e.g., socklen_t. However, when I switch to the doctrinaire data type,
> the build fails on windows machin
r-sign]
>> ../../../../src/share/transport/socket/sysSocket.h:41:5: note: expected
>> 'uint32_t *' but argument is of type 'int *'
>>
>> Do you see these in your build?
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>> On 12/19/2012 03:42 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
