On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:57:54 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> @dcubed-ojdk , @dholmes-ora would you be willing/able to take a look at this
>> change, pretty please?
>
> Sorry @jbachorik but frames and code-blobs are not an area I know.
>
> David
@dholmes-ora, do you know anyone who could be the pr
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 09:25:59 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
>> When the signal sent for AsyncGetCallTrace or JFR would land on a runtime
>> stub (like arraycopy), a vtable stub, or the prolog of a compiled method,
>> it wouldn't be able to detect the sender (caller) frame for multiple
>> reasons.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 09:17:42 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Ludovic Henry has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comments
>
> Hi Ludovic,
> You need two reviews including one (R)eviewer before integration of your fix.
> Than
Hi all,
I'm with Roger on this one. This is an aggregation mechanism. If we want such
an aggregation mechanism, we should probably build one into one of the already
available serviceability technologies (JMX and/or JFR). If we feel the need to
introduce a generic one that can source data from m
JDK Flight Recorder is free, open sourced and part of OpenJDK 11+.
Kind regards,
Marcus
From: serviceability-dev on
behalf of Simon Roberts
Date: Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 18:10
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Always-on Statistical History
I don't begin to claim to know the poli
