RA issue on that further
improvement and if my idea for
it holds true there would be no need for a new BufferBlob subtype.
-- Oleg
On 2/7/2014 1:06 PM, Dean Long wrote:
What's the cost for adding a new BufferBlob subtype? We already have
AdapterBlob and MethodHandlesAdapterBlob.
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025841
>>>
>>>
>>> Open webrev:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sspitsyn/webrevs/2014/hotspot/omazurov/8025841-JVMTI-vtbl.1
>>>
>>>
>>> Summary:
>>>
Though formally not part of the Solaris Studio team any more here is my
opinion based on my recollection of how I implemented interaction with
the JVM via AsyncGetCallTrace.
It's looked up using dlsym. If the symbol is not there Java callstack
collection is shut down. I understand in your case e
