Hello,
Quick background, ahead of strengthening javac's -Xlint:serial checks to
include more aspects of a Serializable or Externalizable type (
JDK-8160675 ), I've been working through the JDK libraries to review
issue found by the upcoming analysis (JDK-8231641).
The latest segment of the l
Hi Joe,
These look ok.
A few of them might be handled by making them transient, but
SuppressWarnings
calls more attention to them as fields that are being serialized, even
indirectly.
The presence of a writeReplace method weakens the coupling of the fields
to the serialized values.
Roger
Hi Roger,
I would certainly be in favor of a more thorough review of the use of
serialization in the management modules by the serviceability team as
follow-up work.
Cheers,
-Joe
On 10/17/2019 11:29 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Joe,
These look ok.
A few of them might be handled by making th
Serguei or others working directly in java.management, any other
comments on these changes?
Thanks,
-Joe
On 10/17/2019 3:58 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Roger,
I would certainly be in favor of a more thorough review of the use of
serialization in the management modules by the serviceability team
This patch looks fine.
Mandy
On 10/23/19 10:27 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Serguei or others working directly in java.management, any other
comments on these changes?
Thanks,
-Joe
On 10/17/2019 3:58 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Roger,
I would certainly be in favor of a more thorough review of the use
Hi Joe,
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 10/23/19 10:27, Joe Darcy wrote:
Serguei or others working directly in java.management, any other
comments on these changes?
Thanks,
-Joe
On 10/17/2019 3:58 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Roger,
I would certainly be in favor of a more thorough revie
