Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 16:42, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
In theory, the process is supposed to prevent
regression test failures from ever creeping in - that's the whole
point.
When they do (inevitably) creep in,
they are supposed to be aggressively targe
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 16:42, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
In theory, the process is supposed to prevent
regression test failures from ever creeping in - that's the whole point.
When they do (inevitably) creep in,
they are supposed to be aggressively targeted.
A gatekeeper demon
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 16:42, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> In theory, the process is supposed to prevent
>> regression test failures from ever creeping in - that's the whole point.
>> When they do (inevitably) creep in,
>> they are supposed to be aggressively targeted.
>> A gatekeeper demonstrates the
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 23:30, Martin Buchholz wrote:
You cannot exclude the Mother Of All Tests.
This is non-negotiable.
More seriously...
It's very difficult to manage creeping failures in regression tests.
Tell me about it. :^(
In theory, the process is suppos
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 23:30, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> You cannot exclude the Mother Of All Tests.
> This is non-negotiable.
More seriously...
It's very difficult to manage creeping failures in regression tests.
In theory, the process is supposed to prevent
regression test failures from ever cr
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Need reviewer for JDK7 testing changes, e.g. testing via:
cd jdk/make && gmake all images && cd ../test && gmake jdk_all
6906210: Fix another minor typo in test/Makefile
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-tl-test-changes4/webrev/
Dan had pointed out my typo i
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 13:43, Tim Bell wrote:
java/util/Collection/MOAT.java
It is a shame we have to exclude Martin's MOAT.java (Mother Of All Tests)
The comment shows the test failing on Solaris 10 x86, but you exclude
it on generic-all
You cannot exclude the Mot
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
:
Dan had pointed out my typo in the jdk/test/Makefile ($->$$)
but when I started running and re-running the tests I ran into
more unstable tests. This webrev includes fixes to 3 tests
and unfortuntately more additions to the ProblemList file.
It would be good to create a bu
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 13:43, Tim Bell wrote:
>> java/util/Collection/MOAT.java
>
> It is a shame we have to exclude Martin's MOAT.java (Mother Of All Tests)
> The comment shows the test failing on Solaris 10 x86, but you exclude
> it on generic-all
You cannot exclude the Mother Of All Tests.
Hi Kelly
See below:
> Need reviewer for JDK7 testing changes, e.g. testing via:
>cd jdk/make && gmake all images && cd ../test && gmake jdk_all
>
> 6906210: Fix another minor typo in test/Makefile
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-tl-test-changes4/webrev/
>
> Dan had pointe
Need reviewer for JDK7 testing changes, e.g. testing via:
cd jdk/make && gmake all images && cd ../test && gmake jdk_all
6906210: Fix another minor typo in test/Makefile
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/jdk7-tl-test-changes4/webrev/
Dan had pointed out my typo in the jdk/test/Makefi
11 matches
Mail list logo
