Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-21 Thread David Holmes
tspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data Hi Markus, I couldn't quite work out if TracingTime is obsolete after these changes? Otherwise I have no further comments. Thanks, David On 20/11/2013 10:17 PM, Marku

RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-21 Thread Markus Gronlund
hanks for your help again Cheers Markus -Original Message- From: David Holmes Sent: den 20 november 2013 23:11 To: Markus Gronlund Cc: serviceability-dev; hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for wo

Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-20 Thread David Holmes
Hi Markus, I couldn't quite work out if TracingTime is obsolete after these changes? Otherwise I have no further comments. Thanks, David On 20/11/2013 10:17 PM, Markus Gronlund wrote: Hi again, I have created an updated webrev02 for the feedback I have gotten so far. In addition, I have add

RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-20 Thread Markus Gronlund
Hi again, I have created an updated webrev02 for the feedback I have gotten so far. In addition, I have added a few improvements to the original suggestion. Updated Webrev02: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mgronlun/8028128/webrev02/ Original Webrev01: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mgronlun/8028128/w

RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-20 Thread Markus Gronlund
3 02:58 To: Markus Gronlund Cc: serviceability-dev; hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data Hi Markus, On 13/11/2013 7:46 PM, Markus Gronlund wrote: > Hi again! > > Tha

RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-20 Thread Markus Gronlund
: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data Hi Markus, Looks like a nice cleanup. Naming it always hard, so I'll avoid that topic ;) A few other minor comments, feel free to ignore. [MG] i agree on the naming parts. I also agree that the cu

Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-18 Thread David Holmes
<mailto:vita...@gmail.com>] *Sent:* den 12 november 2013 15:37 *To:* Markus Gronlund *Cc:* serviceability-dev; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net <mailto:hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net>; hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net <mailto:hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net> *Subject:* Re: R

RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-13 Thread Markus Gronlund
; serviceability-dev; hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data Similar issue with the Ticks versions. Sent from my phone On Nov 12, 2013 8:17 PM, "Vitaly Davidovich" mailto:vita...@gmail.com"vita...@gmail.

RE: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data

2013-11-12 Thread Markus Gronlund
15:37 To: Markus Gronlund Cc: serviceability-dev; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net; hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8028128: Add a type safe alternative for working with counter based data Hi Markus, Ticks and Tickspan don't seem too optimal of names. What about Tim