On 30/04/2016 5:39 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Thanks, looks good.
(In future, please notify code owners using the relevant mailing
lists, in this case core-libs-dev)
Harold was given incorrect information as to the owning area in this case.
Cheers,
David
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, ha
Thanks for the review.
Harold
On 4/29/2016 3:39 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Thanks, looks good.
(In future, please notify code owners using the relevant mailing
lists, in this case core-libs-dev)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, harold seigel
wrote:
Please review this updated webrev that us
Thanks, looks good.
(In future, please notify code owners using the relevant mailing
lists, in this case core-libs-dev)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:32 PM, harold seigel
wrote:
> Please review this updated webrev that uses Martin's fix:
>
> New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_81557
Please review this updated webrev that uses Martin's fix:
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8155727.1/
Thanks, Harold
On 4/29/2016 3:19 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Apologies for taking over here ... This test is maintained externally
in JSR166 CVS. We prefer a version that w
Hi Martin,
Sure. I'll send out another RFR shortly.
Harold
On 4/29/2016 3:19 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Apologies for taking over here ... This test is maintained externally
in JSR166 CVS. We prefer a version that works well with both old and
new outputs. I suggest instead
"(?m)^ *[0-9]+:
Apologies for taking over here ... This test is maintained externally
in JSR166 CVS. We prefer a version that works well with both old and
new outputs. I suggest instead
"(?m)^ *[0-9]+: +([0-9]+) +[0-9]+ +\\Q"+className+"\\E(?:$| )";
Does that work with latest serviceability changes?
On Fri, A
Thanks Christian!
Harold
On 4/29/2016 2:14 PM, Christian Tornqvist wrote:
Hi Harold,
This looks good, thanks for fixing this!
Thanks,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net]
On Behalf Of harold seigel
Sent: Friday,
Hi Harold,
This looks good, thanks for fixing this!
Thanks,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: serviceability-dev [mailto:serviceability-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net]
On Behalf Of harold seigel
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 2:01 PM
To: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RFR(XS)
