Staffan,
Looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2014-01-13 14:30, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> I’m still looking for a Review of this change (I know it’s nobody’s favorite
> code…).
>
> Thanks,
> /Staffan
>
> On 20 dec 2013, at 12:58, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>
>> The DTrace static probe implementation in H
I’m still looking for a Review of this change (I know it’s nobody’s favorite
code…).
Thanks,
/Staffan
On 20 dec 2013, at 12:58, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> The DTrace static probe implementation in Hotspot was written with an earlier
> version of DTrace. With newer versions, DTrace can create a h
On 1/7/14 3:47 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote:
On 20 dec 2013, at 22:07, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
Staffan,
This is nice change and cleanup.
I do not see any issues.
Thanks.
The make/bsd/makefiles/dtrace.make shows that the jhelper.d is disabled for bsd
which means that the jstack action
On 20 dec 2013, at 22:07, serguei.spit...@oracle.com wrote:
> Staffan,
>
> This is nice change and cleanup.
> I do not see any issues.
Thanks.
> The make/bsd/makefiles/dtrace.make shows that the jhelper.d is disabled for
> bsd
> which means that the jstack action is not supported there.
> I'm
Staffan,
This is nice change and cleanup.
I do not see any issues.
The make/bsd/makefiles/dtrace.make shows that the jhelper.d is disabled
for bsd
which means that the jstack action is not supported there.
I'm not very familiar with the BSD DTrace implementation and wonder if
you know any det
The DTrace static probe implementation in Hotspot was written with an earlier
version of DTrace. With newer versions, DTrace can create a header file from
the contents of the .d file that describes the probes. This newer version
(called USDT2) has been used on OS X. Because we have had both vers
