gt; - Original Message -
>> From: dmitry.samers...@oracle.com
>> To: staffan.lar...@oracle.com
>> Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net, hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net
>> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:30:26 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
>> Subject: Re: RFR(S): JDK-8156769
samers...@oracle.com
> To: staffan.lar...@oracle.com
> Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net, hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:30:26 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
> Subject: Re: RFR(S): JDK-8156769
> gc/metaspace/CompressedClassSpaceSizeInJmapHeap.java fail
This looks good.
Thanks,
Serguei
On 5/12/16 06:25, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Everybody,
Please review test changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8156769/webrev.01/
The test is updated to use jhsdb launcher instead of jmap.
-Dmitry
...@oracle.com
To: staffan.lar...@oracle.com
Cc: serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net, hotspot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 5:30:26 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: Re: RFR(S): JDK-8156769
gc/metaspace/CompressedClassSpaceSizeInJmapHeap.java fails with
java.lang.Exception
Staffan
Staffan,
> The GC.heap_info Diagnostic Command should really be updated to
> contain a lot more information (similar to what SA produces).
> Should we file an enhancement for that?
I think yes.
-Dmitry
On 2016-05-12 17:02, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> Looks good!
>
> The GC.heap_info Diagnostic C
Looks good!
The GC.heap_info Diagnostic Command should really be updated to contain a lot
more information (similar to what SA produces). Should we file an enhancement
for that?
Thanks,
/Staffan
> On 12 maj 2016, at 15:25, Dmitry Samersoff
> wrote:
>
> Everybody,
>
> Please review test ch
Everybody,
Please review test changes:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8156769/webrev.01/
The test is updated to use jhsdb launcher instead of jmap.
-Dmitry
--
Dmitry Samersoff
Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
* I would love to change the world, but they won