22:24
> To: Langer, Christoph ;
> daniel.daughe...@oracle.com; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of
> attach operations
>
> On 23/03/2018 5:15 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> >&g
On 23/03/2018 5:15 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi David,
I think you should keep your original fix since it now properly
handles null arguments at the same attach-on-demand layer as the
Linux code that you quoted.
Handling this in args array processing would also be possible
as David suggests
Hi David,
> > I think you should keep your original fix since it now properly
> > handles null arguments at the same attach-on-demand layer as the
> > Linux code that you quoted.
> >
> > Handling this in args array processing would also be possible
> > as David suggests, but it would bother me tha
or in Java - I'll check it out...
Best regards
Christoph
-Original Message-
From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 10:20
To: Langer, Christoph ; serviceability-
d...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue nul
: Langer, Christoph ; David Holmes
; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null
arguments of
attach operations
Hmmm... shouldn't the inconsistency in the Solaris backend also be
addressed?
Dan
On 3/21/18 8:45 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi D
März 2018 14:59
To: Langer, Christoph ; David Holmes
; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null
arguments of
attach operations
Hmmm... shouldn't the inconsistency in the Solaris backend also be
addressed?
Dan
On 3/21/18 8:45
[mailto:daniel.daughe...@oracle.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 14:59
To: Langer, Christoph ; David Holmes
; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of
attach operations
Hmmm... shouldn't the inconsistency in the Solaris backend also be
addr
penjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of
> attach operations
>
> Hmmm... shouldn't the inconsistency in the Solaris backend also be
> addressed?
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 3/21/18 8:45 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
&
--Original Message-
From: David Holmes [mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 10:20
To: Langer, Christoph ; serviceability-
d...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of
attach operations
Hi Christoph,
On 21/03/2018 6:10
Langer, Christoph ; serviceability-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR(S) 8199924: Solaris: Correctly enqueue null arguments of
> attach operations
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 21/03/2018 6:10 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > may I please as
Hi Christoph,
On 21/03/2018 6:10 PM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
may I please ask for reviews of the following small fix.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8199924.0/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199924
If one passes null arguments to the varargs of attac
Hi,
may I please ask for reviews of the following small fix.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8199924.0/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199924
If one passes null arguments to the varargs of attach operations, they get
swallowed on Solaris and following argumen
12 matches
Mail list logo
