On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:33:22 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change handles redefinition during method resolution, by returning the
> new method. It's not needed to reresolve the invocation. See the bug for
> more information.
>
> Tested with tier1-3 and tier8 on linux-x64-debug and macos
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:21:16 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> This change handles redefinition during method resolution, by returning the
>> new method. It's not needed to reresolve the invocation. See the bug for
>> more information.
>>
>> Tested with tier1-3 and tier8 on linux-x64-debug and ma
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:33:22 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> This change handles redefinition during method resolution, but returning the
> new method. It's not needed to reresolve the invocation. See the bug for
> more information.
>
> Tested with tier1-3 and tier8 on linux-x64-debug and maco
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:22:58 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> We had a private slack chat with Coleen.
>> Coleen suggested a nice fix in the InterpreterRuntime::resolve_invoke which
>> I like.
>> My mach5 job with Coleen's patch doing 100 StressRedefine tests runs is
>> passed.
>> So, most likel
This change handles redefinition during method resolution, but returning the
new method. It's not needed to reresolve the invocation. See the bug for more
information.
Tested with tier1-3 and tier8 on linux-x64-debug and macos-x64-debug, and
running the failing tests 100x without failure. Tha
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 01:31:16 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> I don't get serviceability-dev mail anymore because it was being duplicated
>> with hotspot-runtime-dev most of the time. I don't think this fixes the
>> problem, it only makes the test less stressful. Both of these tests find a
>> l
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 00:26:38 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> looks good.
>
> I don't get serviceability-dev mail anymore because it was being duplicated
> with hotspot-runtime-dev most of the time. I don't think this fixes the
> problem, it only makes the test less stressful. Both of these te
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:17:16 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> The StressRedefine.java (base for redefine stress tests) defines 3 important
>> constants:
>> private static int staticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
>> private static int nonstaticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
>> private static int red
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:01:07 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> The StressRedefine.java (base for redefine stress tests) defines 3 important
>> constants:
>> private static int staticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
>> private static int nonstaticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
>> private static int red
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:53:36 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The StressRedefine.java (base for redefine stress tests) defines 3 important
> constants:
> private static int staticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
> private static int nonstaticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
> private static int redefi
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:53:36 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The StressRedefine.java (base for redefine stress tests) defines 3 important
> constants:
> private static int staticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
> private static int nonstaticMethodCallersNumber = 10;
> private static int redefi
11 matches
Mail list logo
