On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 07:46:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> This test is failing in the loom repo when using -Xcomp. The reason is
>> because loom introduced doing a full GC in the codecache sweeper, which
>> causes the large array that the test allocates to be GC'd before the heap
>> dump is
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 07:46:40 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> This test is failing in the loom repo when using -Xcomp. The reason is
>> because loom introduced doing a full GC in the codecache sweeper, which
>> causes the large array that the test allocates to be GC'd before the heap
>> dump is
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 06:08:55 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Chris Plummer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use Reference.reachabilityFence() instead of static field.
>
>
On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 07:43:45 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> This test is failing in the loom repo when using -Xcomp. The reason is
>> because loom introduced doing a full GC in the codecache sweeper, which
>> causes the large array that the test allocates to be GC'd before the heap
>> dump is
> This test is failing in the loom repo when using -Xcomp. The reason is
> because loom introduced doing a full GC in the codecache sweeper, which
> causes the large array that the test allocates to be GC'd before the heap
> dump is done. The fix is to make the large array static rather than a
