On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 06:02:04 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Aleksei Voitylov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to
>> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now
>> contains three commits:
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8247589
>> - JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Lin
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:52:53 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
>> continuing the review thread from here
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>>
>>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>>> setup a bit for those that r
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:00:41 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
> @iignatev I resolved the conflict in whitebox.cpp and fixed a minor style nit
> on the way. Could you take a look?
LGTM
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/49
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:58:56 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
>> @voitylov For future reference please don't force-push commits on open PRs
>> as it breaks the commit history. I can no
>> longer just look at the two most recent commits and see what they added
>> relative to what I had previously rev
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 02:00:06 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> I added the contributors that could be found in the portola project commits.
>> If anyone knows some other contributors I
>> missed, I'll be happy to stand corrected.
>
> @voitylov For future reference please don't force-push commits on ope
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
>> and not the test
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:56:56 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
>> thank you Alan, Erik, and David! When the JEP becomes Targeted, I'll use
>> this PR to integrate the changes.
>
> I added the contributors that could be found in the portola project commits.
> If anyone knows some other contributors
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
>> and not the test
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
>> and not the test
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
>> and not the test
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:30:50 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
>
> thank you Alan, Erik, and David! When the JEP becomes Targeted, I'll use this
> PR to integrate the changes.
I added the contributors that could be found in the portola project commits. I
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:18:39 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Aleksei Voitylov has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Linux/x64 Port
>
> Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
thank you Alan,
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:36:57 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
>> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/StackGuardPages/exeinvoke.c line 282:
>>
>>> 280:
>>> 281: pthread_attr_init(&thread_attr);
>>> 282: pthread_attr_setstacksize(&thread_attr, stack_size);
>>
>> Just a comment in response to the explanat
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 00:08:35 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Aleksei Voitylov has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Linux/x64 Port
>
> Attempting to use the GitHub UI for further review. If this
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 07:03:37 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
>> continuing the review thread from here
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>>
>>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>>> setup a bit for those that
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:44:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Aleksei Voitylov has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> JDK-8247589: Implementation of Alpine Linux/x64 Port
>
> make/autoconf/platform.m4 line 536:
>
>> 534: AC_SUBST(H
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
>> and not the test
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:23:28 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jt
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:23:28 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jt
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 11:23:28 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov wrote:
> continuing the review thread from here
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
>
>> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
>> setup a bit for those that run jt
continuing the review thread from here
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-September/068546.html
> The download side of using JNI in these tests is that it complicates the
> setup a bit for those that run jtreg directly and/or just build the JDK
> and not the test libraries
21 matches
Mail list logo