Hi,
Please review the code changes for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153319.
Webrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~csahu/8153319/
Bug Brief: Test is failing on some platforms.
Problem Identified: Newly created child thread (NamedThread) is finished its
execution
Hi Cheleswer,
is it possible to use j.u.c.CountDownLatch for synchronization instead of sleep?
Regards,
Filipp.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Cheleswer Sahu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please review the code changes for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153319.
>
>
>
> Webrev link: http://
- Original Message -
From: cheleswer.s...@oracle.com
To: hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net, serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 1:23:57 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test
serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
Hi
I don't think that sleep is a good way to ensure that thread is started.
It is not reliable on the slow host / VM under stress and just waste of
time on fast host.
Is it possible just to add any explicit synchronization to ensure that
NamedThread is started?
Leonid
On 05.04.2016 13:23, C
Cheleswer,
Some times ago I invented LingeredAppWithDeadlock for tests like this one.
Please take a look at:
.../jdk/test/sun/tools/jstack/DeadlockDetectionTest.java
.../hotspot/test/serviceability/sa/DeadlockDetectionTest.java
-Dmitry
On 2016-04-05 13:23, Cheleswer Sahu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
test
serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
Hi
I don't think that sleep is a good way to ensure that thread is started.
It is not reliable on the slow host / VM under stress and just waste of time on
fast host.
Is it possible just to add any explicit synchronizati
-
From: Leonid Mesnik
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:00 PM
To: Cheleswer Sahu; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net;
serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test
serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
Hi
I don't think that sleep i
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:00 PM
> To: Cheleswer Sahu; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net;
> serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test
> serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
>
> Hi
>
> I don't think
ssage-
From: Leonid Mesnik
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 7:00 PM
To: Cheleswer Sahu; hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net;
serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test
serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
Hi
I don't think that sleep
-...@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev@openjdk.java.net;
Filipp Zhinkin
Subject: Re: RFR[9u-dev]: 8153319: new test
serviceability/tmtools/jstack/JstackThreadTest.java fails
Cheleswer,
When you re-sync with the current JDK9-hs-rt, you'll have to re-enable this
test. It was quaran
10 matches
Mail list logo
