Hi Marcus,
On 2015-11-11 15:19, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following small patch to improve the support for
prefixes in unified logging.
Instead of the previous format and value/callback, a prefix is now
defined as a function that receives the log buffer as argument,
allowing
Thanks for reviewing!
Marcus
On 2015-11-13 09:20, Per Liden wrote:
Hi Marcus,
On 2015-11-11 15:19, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following small patch to improve the support for
prefixes in unified logging.
Instead of the previous format and value/callback, a prefix is now
def
Thanks for reviewing!
Marcus
On 2015-11-11 17:34, Bengt Rutisson wrote:
Hi Marcus.
On 2015-11-11 15:19, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following small patch to improve the support for
prefixes in unified logging.
Instead of the previous format and value/callback, a prefix is
Hi Marcus.
On 2015-11-11 15:19, Marcus Larsson wrote:
Hi,
Please review the following small patch to improve the support for
prefixes in unified logging.
Instead of the previous format and value/callback, a prefix is now
defined as a function that receives the log buffer as argument,
allow
Hi,
Please review the following small patch to improve the support for
prefixes in unified logging.
Instead of the previous format and value/callback, a prefix is now
defined as a function that receives the log buffer as argument,
allowing it to fill in an arbitrary (or empty!) prefix. (This
