Re: RFR: 8272788: Nonleaf ranked locks should not be safepoint_check_never [v3]

2021-09-01 Thread Coleen Phillimore
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:52:49 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: >> src/hotspot/share/runtime/mutexLocker.cpp line 270: >> >>> 268: >>> 269: def(Threads_lock , PaddedMonitor, barrier, true, >>> _safepoint_check_always); // Used for safepoint protocol. >>> 270: def(NonJavaThr

Re: RFR: 8272788: Nonleaf ranked locks should not be safepoint_check_never [v3]

2021-09-01 Thread Coleen Phillimore
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:27:33 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo wrote: >> Coleen Phillimore has updated the pull request with a new target base due to >> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains four commits: >> >> - Fix merge error. >> - Merge branch 'master' into nonleaf >> - Remove Jfr

Re: RFR: 8272788: Nonleaf ranked locks should not be safepoint_check_never [v3]

2021-09-01 Thread Patricio Chilano Mateo
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:52:12 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote: >> I moved nonleaf ranked locks to be leaf (or leaf+something). Many of the >> leaf locks are safepoint_check_never. Segregating this rank into safepoint >> checking and non-safepoint checking is left for a future RFE. >> Tested with

Re: RFR: 8272788: Nonleaf ranked locks should not be safepoint_check_never [v3]

2021-08-31 Thread Coleen Phillimore
> I moved nonleaf ranked locks to be leaf (or leaf+something). Many of the > leaf locks are safepoint_check_never. Segregating this rank into safepoint > checking and non-safepoint checking is left for a future RFE. > Tested with tier1-3. Tier 4-6 testing in progress. Coleen Phillimore has up