hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8004925: java/net/Socks/SocksV4Test.java failing on all platforms

2012-12-13 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 775b0050144a Author:chegar Date: 2012-12-13 09:55 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/775b0050144a 8004925: java/net/Socks/SocksV4Test.java failing on all platforms Reviewed-by: alanb, dsamersoff ! test/java/net/Socks/SocksV4Test.java

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8004675: Inet6Address.getHostAddress should use string scope identifier where available

2012-12-13 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 682d2d3ccff5 Author:chegar Date: 2012-12-13 14:33 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/682d2d3ccff5 8004675: Inet6Address.getHostAddress should use string scope identifier where available Summary: ...and some minor stylistic cleanup Reviewed-by: khazra,

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2012-12-13 Thread sean . mullan
Changeset: c97618a3c8c2 Author:juh Date: 2012-12-13 09:35 -0500 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/c97618a3c8c2 7193792: sun/security/pkcs11/ec/TestECDSA.java failing intermittently Reviewed-by: vinnie, wetmore ! test/ProblemList.txt ! test/sun/security/pkcs11/ec/TestE

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8003890: corelibs test scripts should pass TESTVMOPTS

2012-12-13 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: ae5d04dbacd6 Author:chegar Date: 2012-12-13 14:47 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ae5d04dbacd6 8003890: corelibs test scripts should pass TESTVMOPTS Reviewed-by: chegar, alanb Contributed-by: Mark Sheppard ! test/com/oracle/net/sanity.sh ! test/com

code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Greetings, I'm sponsoring this code review request from Ron Durbin. This change is targeted at JDK8/HSX-25 in the RT_Baseline repo. Please make sure you include Ron on any e-mail replies since he is not yet on the OpenJDK aliases. Dan Intro: This set of changes removes the makefile support fo

Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread [email protected]
Dan, It is nice fix and simplified many places. Just one minor comment: make/bsd/makefiles/dtrace.make 41 #LIBJVM_DB = libjvm_db.dylib 42 LIBJVM_DB = libjvm_db.dylib 45 #LIBJVM_DTRACE = libjvm_dtrace.dylib 46 LIBJVM_DTRACE = libjvm_dtrace.dylib The lines #41 and #45 can be removed

Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Forgot to mention the testing: These changes were tested with a full JPRT-hotspotwest job. Verified that the JPRT bundles no longer contain _g files: $ pwd /net/prt-archiver.us.oracle.com/data/jprt/archive/2012/12/2012-12-13-030336.ddaugher.7153050_exp/bundles $ for zfile in *.zip; do > echo "

Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Serguei, Thanks for the fast review! I could swear that Ron had removed lines 41 and 45 in an earlier version. Sigh... Will be fixed. Dan On 12/13/12 1:22 PM, [email protected] wrote: Dan, It is nice fix and simplified many places. Just one minor comment: make/bsd/makefiles/dtrac

RE: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Ron Durbin
Thx again -Original Message- From: Daniel D. Daugherty Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:51 PM To: build-dev; [email protected]; [email protected]; Ron Durbin Subject: Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support Serguei, Thanks

RE: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Ron Durbin
You are correct Thx Ron From: Serguei Spitsyn Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:23 PM To: Daniel Daugherty Cc: build-dev; [email protected]; [email protected]; Ron Durbin Subject: Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Just for the record: I have reviewed all of Ron's changes and I approve them. Dan On 12/13/12 11:53 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Greetings, I'm sponsoring this code review request from Ron Durbin. This change is targeted at JDK8/HSX-25 in the RT_Baseline repo. Please make sure you include

RFR (trivial): 8003632 HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors

2012-12-13 Thread David Holmes
Trivial update of max classfile version to 52. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8003632/webrev/ Pushing through tl/jdk Thanks, David

Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Adding back in the other OpenJDK aliases... Ron's e-mail has gone off-line (no e-mail for him since 1440 MT)... Coleen, Thanks for the review! This bug (7153050) is just for the Makefile changes so that the reviews are more focused. Ron has separate bugs for the other parts of the hotspot repo

Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Trying again... now my e-mail client is complaining... Adding back in the other OpenJDK aliases... Ron's e-mail has gone off-line (no e-mail for him since 1440 MT)... Coleen, Thanks for the review! This bug (7153050) is just for the Makefile changes so that the reviews are more focused. Ron h

Re: RFR (trivial): 8003632 HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors

2012-12-13 Thread Lance Andersen
+1 -- Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 [email protected] Sent from my iPhone On Dec 13, 2012, at 6:30 PM, David Holmes wrote: > Trivial update of max classfile version to 52. > > http:/

RE: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' support

2012-12-13 Thread Ron Durbin
I am back and Dan has It correct (JDK-8005044) -Original Message- From: Daniel D. Daugherty Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:32 PM To: [email protected]; build-dev; [email protected] Subject: Re: code review request for 7153050 remove crufty '_g' s

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 8001114: Container annotation is not checked for semantic correctness

2012-12-13 Thread jonathan . gibbons
Changeset: 376d6c1b49e5 Author:jfranck Date: 2012-12-03 11:16 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/376d6c1b49e5 8001114: Container annotation is not checked for semantic correctness Reviewed-by: jjg ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/Annotations.jav

Re: RFR (trivial): 8003632 HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors

2012-12-13 Thread Mandy Chung
Looks good to me. I didn't know about this file and so I was interested in finding out more. This file classfile_constants.h doesn't look like a header file exported from the hotspot repo (I couldn't find it). It's used by hprof and the old verifier (jdk/src/share/native/common/check_code.h

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 8003632: HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors

2012-12-13 Thread david . holmes
Changeset: 8d7323a9d8ed Author:dholmes Date: 2012-12-13 21:18 -0500 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8d7323a9d8ed 8003632: HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors Reviewed-by: mchung, lancea ! src/share/javavm/export/classfile_constants.h

Re: RFR (trivial): 8003632 HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors

2012-12-13 Thread David Holmes
On 14/12/2012 12:03 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: Looks good to me. Thanks Mandy. FYI tested with nsk/hprof suite I didn't know about this file and so I was interested in finding out more. This file classfile_constants.h doesn't look like a header file exported from the hotspot repo (I couldn't fin

Re: RFR (trivial): 8003632 HPROF class file version java.lang.RuntimeException errors

2012-12-13 Thread Kelly O'Hair
This file was added by me, to the jdk repo, mostly for reading class files. But as I recall (it was a while ago) the idea was that this file would describe the classfile format for the jdk being released. As I recall, the hotspot sources never exported anything like this, certainly not something