Hi Patricio,
On 18/03/2020 6:14 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following patch:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240902
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchilanomate/8240902/v1/webrev/
Calling closeConnection() on an already created/opened connection
i
Looks good.
StefanK
On 2020-03-18 05:52, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240906
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-zgc.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-zgc.txt
--- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-zgc.txt
+++ b
Hello,
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8240604/webrev.01
Utils.TEST_CLASS_PATH, Platform.jvmLibDir(), and /native flag are added
to the CustomLauncherTest.java test. I also included TEST_NATIVE_PATH to
the Utils lib.
I have not found a history about C
On 18.03.2020 14:57, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8240604/webrev.01
Utils.TEST_CLASS_PATH, Platform.jvmLibDir(), and /native flag are
added to the CustomLauncherTest.java test. I also included
TEST_NATIVE_PATH to
Hi Alexander,
> I also included TEST_NATIVE_PATH to the Utils lib.
for the sake of clarity and ease of backporting, I'd prefer to have it added by
a separate bug and commit.
> Could I just use "hg remove binary-fie" and run webrev to add the removed
> binary files into webrev?
IIRC correctly, w
On 18.03.2020 19:00, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I also included TEST_NATIVE_PATH to the Utils lib.
for the sake of clarity and ease of backporting, I'd prefer to have it added by
a separate bug and commit.
Here is the updated fix where TEST_NATIVE_PATH is not added to the Utils
li
Hi Serguei,
Thanks for your review! A quick update on my progress:
The wrong condition was a good find! In-fact so much that it lead to the
whole implementation not reporting any unloaded classes. I changed that
back, and now it's so slow because of all those unloaded classes firing
events, I'm t
+import static jdk.test.lib.Utils.TEST_CLASS_PATH;
I'm not a huge fun of 'import static', yet don't insist on removing it either.
+System.out.println(" libjvm: " + jvmLibDir.toString());
jvmLibDir doesn't point to libjvm, so you need either update message prefix or
use the actua
Thanks!
On 3/18/20 2:00 AM, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
Looks good.
StefanK
On 2020-03-18 05:52, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240906
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-zgc.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList-zgc.tx
Hi Alex,
Thank you for reviewing this change.
Best regards,
Daniil
On 3/17/20, 11:58 AM, "Alex Menkov" wrote:
LGTM
--alex
On 03/17/2020 11:40, Daniil Titov wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Please review a new version of the fix that removes the old version of
the code
On 18.03.2020 20:02, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
+import static jdk.test.lib.Utils.TEST_CLASS_PATH;
I'm not a huge fun of 'import static', yet don't insist on removing it
either.
+ System.out.println(" libjvm : " + jvmLibDir.toString());
jvmLibDir doesn't point to libjvm, so you need either update m
Thanks!
Chris
On 3/17/20 10:16 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 18/03/2020 2:59 pm, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227340
diff --git a/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt b/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/jdk/ProblemList.txt
thanks! LGTM.
-- Igor
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Alexander Scherbatiy
> wrote:
>
> On 18.03.2020 20:02, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>
>> +import static jdk.test.lib.Utils.TEST_CLASS_PATH;
>> I'm not a huge fun of 'import static', yet don't insist on removing it
>> either.
>>
>> +
Hi
Could you please review following fix which slightly refactor vmTestbase
stress test harness. This refactoring helps to add virtual threads
testing support.
The Wicket uses plain sync/wait/notify mechanism which cause carrier
thread starvation and should not be used in virtual threads. Th
Hi Leonid,
I've started looking at your webrev, and so far have a couple questions:
> Test
> vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ObjectReference/referringObjects/referringObjects003/referringObjects003a.java
> was updated to don't use Wicket. (The lock has a reference to thread which
> affects test.)
can't you
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241162
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
+++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
serviceability/sa/Te
Thumbs up. Also, this fix is trivial.
Dan
On 3/18/20 4:05 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241162
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList
Thanks!
On 3/18/20 1:07 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Thumbs up. Also, this fix is trivial.
Dan
On 3/18/20 4:05 PM, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8241162
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
b/test/hotspot/jt
On 3/18/20 12:48 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Hi Leonid,
I've started looking at your webrev, and so far have a couple questions:
Test
vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ObjectReference/referringObjects/referringObjects003/referringObjects003a.java
was updated to don't use Wicket. (The lock has a reference to
On 3/17/20 4:14 PM, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following patch:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240902
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchilanomate/8240902/v1/webrev/
src/jdk.jdi/share/native/libdt_shmem/shmemBase.c
L411: int attempts = 10;
Hi David,
On 3/18/20 4:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Patricio,
On 18/03/2020 6:14 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following patch:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240902
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchilanomate/8240902/v1/webrev/
Calling closeCon
Hi Patricio,
Good finding, thank you for taking care about this!
The fix looks good in general.
There are several spots with the wrong indent (must be 4, not 2):
64 #define ENTER_CONNECTION(connection) do { \
65
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>
>
> On 3/18/20 12:48 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>> Hi Leonid,
>>
>> I've started looking at your webrev, and so far have a couple questions:
>>
>>> Test
>>> vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ObjectReference/referringObjects/referringObjects003/referring
> I need more time to get grasp of Wicket and your changes in it; will come
> back to you after I understand them.
ok, now when I believe that I have enough understanding of Wicket, I have a few
comments:
1.
> 68 private Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
> 69 private Condition conditi
Patricio,
This is a separate follow up about the jshell tests. Since I have been
tracking these as part of my GK work and filed a number of those bugs,
I figured I would help analyze them...
JDK-8209848 test/langtools/jdk/jshell tests failed with Accept timed out
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/br
serviceability-dev@... was included in this email by mistake.
This was only supposed to go to Patricio since the Mach5 links
won't work outside of Oracle. Sigh...
Sorry about the noise folks!
Dan
On 3/18/20 5:37 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
Patricio,
This is a separate follow up about the
Hi Dan,
On 3/18/20 5:30 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 3/17/20 4:14 PM, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following patch:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240902
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchilanomate/8240902/v1/webrev/
src/jdk.jdi/share/native/li
Hi Serguei,
On 3/18/20 6:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Patricio,
Good finding, thank you for taking care about this!
The fix looks good in general.
There are several spots with the wrong indent (must be 4, not 2):
64 #define ENTER_CONNECTION(connection) do { \
65 InterlockedIncre
On 3/18/20 2:30 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
I need more time to get grasp of Wicket and your changes in it; will
come back to you after I understand them.
ok, now when I believe that I have enough understanding of Wicket, I
have a few comments:
1.
68 private Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
69
Reviewed.
— Igor
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 3:18 PM, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 3/18/20 2:30 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
>>> I need more time to get grasp of Wicket and your changes in it; will come
>>> back to you after I understand them.
>> ok, now when I believe that I have enough unde
Thank you for review and feedback.
Leonid
On 3/18/20 3:22 PM, Igor Ignatev wrote:
Reviewed.
— Igor
On Mar 18, 2020, at 3:18 PM, Leonid Mesnik
wrote:
On 3/18/20 2:30 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
I need more time to get grasp of Wicket and your changes in it;
will come back to you after I
Hi Patricio,
On 19/03/2020 6:44 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi David,
On 3/18/20 4:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Patricio,
On 18/03/2020 6:14 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following patch:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240902
Webrev: http://cr.openj
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240543
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
+++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
serviceability/sa/Te
Looks good Chris.
Thanks,
David
On 19/03/2020 12:35 pm, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240543
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
--- a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
++
Thanks!
On 3/18/20 8:42 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Looks good Chris.
Thanks,
David
On 19/03/2020 12:35 pm, Chris Plummer wrote:
Hello,
Please review the following:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8240543
diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt
b/test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemLis
Hi David,
On 3/18/20 8:10 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Patricio,
On 19/03/2020 6:44 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi David,
On 3/18/20 4:27 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Patricio,
On 18/03/2020 6:14 am, Patricio Chilano wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the following patch:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk
36 matches
Mail list logo