> While working on JDK-8280003, I noticed that
> java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java does not test arrays
> with more than 1-byte size elements, and no large arrays (past 4G limit) are
> tested either. It would be better to add those test cases.
>
> Additional testing:
> - [
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:19:07 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> Please update copyright years.
Updated, thanks!
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7132
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 04:22:28 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> The JDWP spec mentions nothing about `DisableCollection` and
>> `EnableCollection` tracking the depth or nesting of the commands. This means
>> that `EnableCollection` should enable collection no matter how many
>> `DisableCollection` c
> Changes:
> - ClassFileReconstituter is updated to restore "MethodParameters" attribute;
> - handling of the attribute in VM_RedefineClasses is moved to be consistent
> with other code (like local variable table);
> - copied ClassTransformer class (from test/jdk/com/sun/jdi/lib/jdb) to
> /test/l
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 19:02:39 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> Alex Menkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fixed condition
>
> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiRedefineClasses.cpp line 3684:
>
>> 3682: // Update constant po
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:09:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).
LGTM. I hope in the future IDEs will pick that rule up and offer some help when
writing `{@link }` `@see`...
-
PR: https://git
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:00:37 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> LGTM. I hope in the future IDEs will pick that rule up and offer some help
> when writing `{@link }` `@see`...
They will do it quicker, if you create new or support existing bugs in their
bug trackers.
-
PR: https://git.open
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:09:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
Is that a wrong bug? If you are talking about module-prefix syntax for links,
then it was introduced in JDK 15; JDK-8164408: Add module support for @see,
@link and @linkplain javado
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:33:18 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> > Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
>
> Is that a wrong bug? If you are talking about module-prefix syntax for links,
> then it was introduced in JDK 15; JDK-8164408: Add module support for @see,
> @link and @link
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:09:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
Marked as reviewed by aivanov (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7189
> Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by
the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional commits since t
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:09:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Use presumed syntax that will be introduced by JDK-8280488.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 8e82d002
Author:Joe Darcy
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/8e82d0021c119b7793870811fad37d7659c1174d
Stat
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 07:41:44 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> JDK-8249944 moved AllStatic to its own header. We should use that one
>> instead of allocation.hpp where possible to reduce header dependencies.
>>
>> This patch:
>> - replaces includes of allocation.hpp with allstatic.hpp where appropia
13 matches
Mail list logo
