On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:08:35 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The nsk.jvmti test popframe004 is failing with the JVM args:
> `-Xcomp -XX:+CreateCoredumpOnCrash -ea -esa -XX:CompileThreshold=100
> -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-TieredCompilation`
>
> The call to join() below should not hav
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:08:35 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The nsk.jvmti test popframe004 is failing with the JVM args:
> `-Xcomp -XX:+CreateCoredumpOnCrash -ea -esa -XX:CompileThreshold=100
> -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-TieredCompilation`
>
> The call to join() below should not hav
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:08:35 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The nsk.jvmti test popframe004 is failing with the JVM args:
> `-Xcomp -XX:+CreateCoredumpOnCrash -ea -esa -XX:CompileThreshold=100
> -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-TieredCompilation`
>
> The call to join() below should not hav
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:08:35 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> The nsk.jvmti test popframe004 is failing with the JVM args:
> `-Xcomp -XX:+CreateCoredumpOnCrash -ea -esa -XX:CompileThreshold=100
> -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-TieredCompilation`
>
> The call to join() below should not hav
The nsk.jvmti test popframe004 is failing with the JVM args:
`-Xcomp -XX:+CreateCoredumpOnCrash -ea -esa -XX:CompileThreshold=100
-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions -XX:-TieredCompilation`
The call to join() below should not have a timeout parameter.
try {
if (popFrameClsThr.
> open l10n msg drop
> All tests passed.
Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
added comments in CurrencyNames root in base, moved US CurrencyNames back to
base, readded original Chinese translation
-
Changes:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:47:01 GMT, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> can I have reviews for this change that moves `HeapRegion::_compaction_top`
> into the `G1FullCollector` class; my reasoning is that these values are
> transient temporary values only ever useful for the full collection
>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:14:01 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Thomas Schatzl has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> kbarrett review
>
> Marked as reviewed by kbarrett (Reviewer).
Thanks @kimbarrett @sangheon for your reviews.
--