On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:41:12 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> It might be that you need to add some nop() bytecode or something to
> generate the code attribute?
@coleenp This seems like a valid solution. By the way, can we modify this
testcase in OpenJDK or should the OpenJ9 team make the chan
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 01:57:32 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
>> The VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods was added in JDK 13 as
>> a temporary backward compatibility flag under JDK-8192936 and was
>> immediately marked as Deprecate. The fix is to obsolete this option in JDK
>> 26 and
> The VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods was added in JDK 13 as
> a temporary backward compatibility flag under JDK-8192936 and was immediately
> marked as Deprecate. The fix is to obsolete this option in JDK 26 and expire
> in JDK 27.
>
> TBD: Need to submit a related CSR.
>
>
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:44:05 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Tests which run serviceability tools to attach to the main test process can
> get deadlock with streaming output (see #24672 )
> The fix disables attach streaming output for tests in jdk/sun/tools/jcmd
>
> Testing: tier6, tier7
Okay, but a
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 06:05:26 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote:
> It was decided in a local discussion with Chris and Alan to update the JVMTI
> spec to make descriptions/clarifications of some `JVMTI_ERROR_OPAQUE_FRAME`
> cases more consistent.
> This impacts the following JVMTI spec sections:
> - `
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:44:05 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Tests which run serviceability tools to attach to the main test process can
> get deadlock with streaming output (see #24672 )
> The fix disables attach streaming output for tests in jdk/sun/tools/jcmd
>
> Testing: tier6, tier7
Marked as r
Tests which run serviceability tools to attach to the main test process can get
deadlock with streaming output (see #24672 )
The fix disables attach streaming output for tests in jdk/sun/tools/jcmd
Testing: tier6, tier7
-
Commit messages:
- fix
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 03:32:34 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
>> Fix how ThreadReference.popFrame() and ThreadReference.forceEarlyReturn deal
>> with JDWP OPAQUE_FRAME error.
>>
>> Before virtual threads, OpaqueFrameException did not exist and these API
>> always threw NativeMethodException when JDWP
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 06:24:16 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [cbb3d23e](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/cbb3d23e19a8a893bf2fbda03e7bda4f4b7a59a6)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository to jdk25.
>
>
> Test-
On Wed, 21 May 2025 09:18:56 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> So if you think you want to do this library by library, then do so, and if
> so keep this PR
A lib by lib approach is probably easier to discuss/review.
Changing all (or most) JDK native libs at once will probably make some people
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 20:34:42 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> > Wait, `LOW` is `-O2`? 👀 I thought it was like no optimization at all. I'm
> > sooo confused with these levels. So maybe going from `LOW` to `SIZE` will
> > actually lose more optimization than I thought. _sigh_
>
> -Os is the same as -O
11 matches
Mail list logo
