On Fri, 5 May 2023 14:40:52 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Roman Kennke has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Relax zapped-entry test when calling thread is not owning thread
>
> src/hotspot/share/runtime/lockStack.cpp line
On Fri, 5 May 2023 05:54:29 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This change adds a fast-locking scheme as an alternative to the current
>> stack-locking implementation. It retains the advantages of stack-locking
>> (namely fast locking in uncontended code-paths), while avoiding the overload
>> of the
On Fri, 5 May 2023 06:21:18 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Updates look good to me. Thanks.
Nice, thank you!
The PR has 4 approvals now. Are we good to go, or should I wait for others to
approve? (And if so, who?)
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10907#issuecomment-15357
On Fri, 5 May 2023 05:54:29 GMT, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> This change adds a fast-locking scheme as an alternative to the current
>> stack-locking implementation. It retains the advantages of stack-locking
>> (namely fast locking in uncontended code-paths), while avoiding the overload
>> of the
> This change adds a fast-locking scheme as an alternative to the current
> stack-locking implementation. It retains the advantages of stack-locking
> (namely fast locking in uncontended code-paths), while avoiding the overload
> of the mark word. That overloading causes massive problems with Li
