Re: RFR: JDK-8318636: Add jcmd to print annotated process memory map [v12]

2023-11-12 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 07:38:24 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote: >> Analysts and supporters often use /proc/xx/maps to make sense of the memory >> footprint of a process. >> >> Interpreting the memory map correctly can help when used as a complement to >> other tools (e.g. NMT). There even exist tools o

Re: RFR: JDK-8318636: Add jcmd to print annotated process memory map [v12]

2023-11-10 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:45:11 GMT, Johan Sjölen wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for your hard work on this! LGTM. Thank you for your Review, Johan! - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16301#issuecomment-1805489022

Re: RFR: JDK-8318636: Add jcmd to print annotated process memory map [v12]

2023-11-10 Thread Johan Sjölen
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 07:38:24 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote: >> Analysts and supporters often use /proc/xx/maps to make sense of the memory >> footprint of a process. >> >> Interpreting the memory map correctly can help when used as a complement to >> other tools (e.g. NMT). There even exist tools o

Re: RFR: JDK-8318636: Add jcmd to print annotated process memory map [v12]

2023-11-09 Thread Thomas Stuefe
> Analysts and supporters often use /proc/xx/maps to make sense of the memory > footprint of a process. > > Interpreting the memory map correctly can help when used as a complement to > other tools (e.g. NMT). There even exist tools out there that attempt to > annotate the process memory map wi