Hi,
I would also like to participate in this session. When are you going
to send data about the location of the IRC session?
I have also another question: could you recommend any easy in use IRC
client (for Windows preferably)? I haven't been using IRC (except one
or two times).
Best regards,
Pi
I have committed a simple test showing how to expose an endpoint and
how to communicate with it.
See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/branches/
servicemix-4.0/core/src/test/java/org/apache/servicemix/core/
IntegrationTest.java
How does it sounds ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Thanks Chris !
It seems like the experts have answered...
So i guess we will switch to slf4j :-)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/28/07, Chris Custine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are correct about OSGi having more control over classloaders, but in the
> case of JCL things are a little different.
On Aug 28, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Piotr Bzdyl wrote:
Hi,
I would also like to participate in this session. When are you going
to send data about the location of the IRC session?
See http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?
post=12323536&framed=y&skin=12049
We will use the standard IRC channel:
Hello Guillaume,
I am getting a page not found with the javadoc site.
Regards,
Gordon
Nodet Guillaume wrote:
I've refactored a few things in the api and introduced back the
listeners and flows.
For those who prefer to read javadoc, take a look at:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/service
Yeah, i moved it. Try
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-4.0-SNAPSHOT/
The direct link to the api is:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/servicemix-4.0-SNAPSHOT/
org.apache.servicemix.api/apidocs/index.html
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Gordon Dickens wrote
+3 ok.
On 8/28/07, Kit Plummer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/28/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/28/07, Nodet Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unfortunately I will be traveling until Friday evening.
> > > What about moving it to Monday instead at the same ho
