[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40253
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1082:
-
Kristian, I don't see where the isFactoryJNDIregistered flag is set to true
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1082.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Sending
servicemix-core/src/main/java/
Hello,
I would like to write a JUnit class that will test my service units
without ServiceMix running outside of the JUnit test. Is there an
example of being able to send in a message and be able to test the
outcome without starting ServiceMix outside the JUnit test?
Currently I am writing
For service unit, you can do junit tests easily (see [1] for a example).
James has recently worked on providing the needed informations so that
you can junit SA too (see [2]) but this is only available in
servicemix 3.2.
[1]
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/servicemix/branches/servicemix-3.1/de
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40257
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1052:
-
As a workaround, you can disable the jbi descriptor generation. ServiceMix
make configurable if CONTENT_TP
---
Key: SM-1084
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Thomas Termin
--
This message is autom
Additional geronimo deployment plan support
---
Key: SM-1085
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1085
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-1052.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Btw, I think this is a pure classloader problem, so I don't think this is a bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40258
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1044:
-
Sorry about the delay ...
I agree about the route based on a value, but it
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Termin updated SM-1084:
--
Component/s: servicemix-http
Description: Make it configurable if the http content type
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40260
]
Thomas Termin commented on SM-1084:
---
fixed for 3.1.3
Author: tterm
Date: Thu Oct 4 04:46:09 2007
New Revision: 5818
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Termin resolved SM-1084.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fix for 3.2
Author: tterm
Date: Thu Oct 4 05:39:05 2007
New Revision: 581878
UR
Example of how to use CXFBC Provider.
-
Key: SM-1086
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1086
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.2
Environment: Windo
Servicemix-http provider should unwrap JBI messages before sending them to the
target URI
-
Key: SM-1087
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40263
]
Ryan Moquin commented on SM-1087:
-
I forgot that there is a servicemix-http provider declaration that allows for
the u
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40262
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1087:
-
If you use the new endpoint, it should work that way.
> Servicemix-http pr
On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to make ServiceMix 4.0 as modular as possible. This would
> mean that ServiceMix 4.0 main distribution would come with the minimal
> set, while additional features could be provisioned and configured
> using OBR, the Deployment Admi
DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows
---
Key: SM-1089
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Snyder updated SM-1089:
-
Attachment: ServiceMixComponents.dot
> DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Snyder updated SM-1089:
-
Attachment: ServiceMixFlow.dot
> DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows
> -
Yes you are crazy.
I have to agree - dependency hell is not something I'd like to have to
overcome. Eclipse's deal is a nice example.
Kit
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 4, 2007, at 4:31 PM, "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
I agree that eventually you will have certain components that have their own
release cycles seperate from the core components. I think it will take
several releases of all components as an entire system before you will be
comfortable splitting things into seperate sub-projects, but as the core
com
On 10/4/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/4/07, Chris Custine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I agree that eventually you will have certain components that have their
> own
> > release cycles seperate from the core components. I think it will take
> > several releases of all com
Yeah, that's what I have been working on for ServiceMix 4.0.
The core module contains the implementation of the api module. Both
are not tied to OSGi at all. The OSGi bits and wiring bits are all
done using spring-osgi in the nmr nodule.
That way, ServiceMix core container is independant of both
I guess the idea of a self-provisionning application is somewhat
unrelated to the release cycle of the different bits of the
application. It seems people are a bit scared to split the lifecycle
soon. So let's work on a monolithic release cycle and see how it
goes. i think things should be easier
JBI 1.0 compatibility layer: Offline tool to transform JBI artifacts in OSGi
bundles
Key: SM-1090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1090
Project: Ser
26 matches
Mail list logo