[jira] Commented: (SM-1082) Inconsistent exception handling in ClientFactory

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40253 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1082: - Kristian, I don't see where the isFactoryJNDIregistered flag is set to true

[jira] Resolved: (SM-1082) Inconsistent exception handling in ClientFactory

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1082. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Sending

[jira] Created: (SM-1085) Additional geronimo deployment plan support

2007-10-04 Thread Kristian Koehler (JIRA)
Additional geronimo deployment plan support --- Key: SM-1085 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1085 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: New Feature Components: geronimo

[jira] Closed: (SM-1052) Classloader problems in JMS component while generating jbi descriptor

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet closed SM-1052. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Btw, I think this is a pure classloader problem, so I don't think this is a

[jira] Commented: (SM-1044) Routing based on message property and set new property on the message in EIP content based router

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40258 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1044: - Sorry about the delay ... I agree about the route based on a value, but it

[jira] Commented: (SM-1087) Servicemix-http provider should unwrap JBI messages before sending them to the target URI

2007-10-04 Thread Ryan Moquin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40263 ] Ryan Moquin commented on SM-1087: - I forgot that there is a servicemix-http provider declaration that allows for the

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to make ServiceMix 4.0 as modular as possible. This would mean that ServiceMix 4.0 main distribution would come with the minimal set, while additional features could be provisioned and configured using OBR, the Deployment Admin or

[jira] Updated: (SM-1089) DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruce Snyder updated SM-1089: - Attachment: ServiceMixComponents.dot DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

[jira] Updated: (SM-1089) DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruce Snyder updated SM-1089: - Attachment: ServiceMixFlow.dot DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Kit Plummer
Yes you are crazy. I have to agree - dependency hell is not something I'd like to have to overcome. Eclipse's deal is a nice example. Kit Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Custine
On 10/4/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/4/07, Chris Custine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that eventually you will have certain components that have their own release cycles seperate from the core components. I think it will take several releases of all components as