[jira] Commented: (SM-1082) Inconsistent exception handling in ClientFactory

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40253 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1082: - Kristian, I don't see where the isFactoryJNDIregistered flag is set to true

[jira] Resolved: (SM-1082) Inconsistent exception handling in ClientFactory

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1082. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Guillaume Nodet Sending servicemix-core/src/main/java/

Testing Service Units with JUnit

2007-10-04 Thread Gordon Dickens
Hello, I would like to write a JUnit class that will test my service units without ServiceMix running outside of the JUnit test. Is there an example of being able to send in a message and be able to test the outcome without starting ServiceMix outside the JUnit test? Currently I am writing

Re: Testing Service Units with JUnit

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet
For service unit, you can do junit tests easily (see [1] for a example). James has recently worked on providing the needed informations so that you can junit SA too (see [2]) but this is only available in servicemix 3.2. [1] http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/browse/servicemix/branches/servicemix-3.1/de

[jira] Commented: (SM-1052) Classloader problems in JMS component while generating jbi descriptor

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40257 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1052: - As a workaround, you can disable the jbi descriptor generation. ServiceMix

[jira] Created: (SM-1084) make configurable if CONTENT_TP

2007-10-04 Thread Thomas Termin (JIRA)
make configurable if CONTENT_TP --- Key: SM-1084 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Thomas Termin -- This message is autom

[jira] Created: (SM-1085) Additional geronimo deployment plan support

2007-10-04 Thread Kristian Koehler (JIRA)
Additional geronimo deployment plan support --- Key: SM-1085 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1085 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: New Feature Components: geronimo

[jira] Closed: (SM-1052) Classloader problems in JMS component while generating jbi descriptor

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet closed SM-1052. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Btw, I think this is a pure classloader problem, so I don't think this is a bu

[jira] Commented: (SM-1044) Routing based on message property and set new property on the message in EIP content based router

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40258 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1044: - Sorry about the delay ... I agree about the route based on a value, but it

[jira] Updated: (SM-1084) make configurable if CONTENT-TYPE is used as property from the normalized message or not

2007-10-04 Thread Thomas Termin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Termin updated SM-1084: -- Component/s: servicemix-http Description: Make it configurable if the http content type

[jira] Commented: (SM-1084) make configurable if CONTENT-TYPE is used as property from the normalized message or not

2007-10-04 Thread Thomas Termin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40260 ] Thomas Termin commented on SM-1084: --- fixed for 3.1.3 Author: tterm Date: Thu Oct 4 04:46:09 2007 New Revision: 5818

[jira] Resolved: (SM-1084) make configurable if CONTENT-TYPE is used as property from the normalized message or not

2007-10-04 Thread Thomas Termin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Termin resolved SM-1084. --- Resolution: Fixed fix for 3.2 Author: tterm Date: Thu Oct 4 05:39:05 2007 New Revision: 581878 UR

[jira] Created: (SM-1086) Example of how to use CXFBC Provider.

2007-10-04 Thread Ryan Moquin (JIRA)
Example of how to use CXFBC Provider. - Key: SM-1086 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1086 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.2 Environment: Windo

[jira] Created: (SM-1087) Servicemix-http provider should unwrap JBI messages before sending them to the target URI

2007-10-04 Thread Ryan Moquin (JIRA)
Servicemix-http provider should unwrap JBI messages before sending them to the target URI - Key: SM-1087 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087 Pr

[jira] Commented: (SM-1087) Servicemix-http provider should unwrap JBI messages before sending them to the target URI

2007-10-04 Thread Ryan Moquin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40263 ] Ryan Moquin commented on SM-1087: - I forgot that there is a servicemix-http provider declaration that allows for the u

[jira] Commented: (SM-1087) Servicemix-http provider should unwrap JBI messages before sending them to the target URI

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40262 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1087: - If you use the new endpoint, it should work that way. > Servicemix-http pr

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to make ServiceMix 4.0 as modular as possible. This would > mean that ServiceMix 4.0 main distribution would come with the minimal > set, while additional features could be provisioned and configured > using OBR, the Deployment Admi

[jira] Created: (SM-1089) DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder (JIRA)
DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows --- Key: SM-1089 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Updated: (SM-1089) DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruce Snyder updated SM-1089: - Attachment: ServiceMixComponents.dot > DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows >

[jira] Updated: (SM-1089) DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows

2007-10-04 Thread Bruce Snyder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruce Snyder updated SM-1089: - Attachment: ServiceMixFlow.dot > DotViewService not generating DOT files for endpoints or flows > -

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Kit Plummer
Yes you are crazy. I have to agree - dependency hell is not something I'd like to have to overcome. Eclipse's deal is a nice example. Kit Sent from my iPhone On Oct 4, 2007, at 4:31 PM, "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/4/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Custine
I agree that eventually you will have certain components that have their own release cycles seperate from the core components. I think it will take several releases of all components as an entire system before you will be comfortable splitting things into seperate sub-projects, but as the core com

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Custine
On 10/4/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/4/07, Chris Custine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that eventually you will have certain components that have their > own > > release cycles seperate from the core components. I think it will take > > several releases of all com

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Yeah, that's what I have been working on for ServiceMix 4.0. The core module contains the implementation of the api module. Both are not tied to OSGi at all. The OSGi bits and wiring bits are all done using spring-osgi in the nmr nodule. That way, ServiceMix core container is independant of both

Re: ServiceMix 4.0 modularity

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I guess the idea of a self-provisionning application is somewhat unrelated to the release cycle of the different bits of the application. It seems people are a bit scared to split the lifecycle soon. So let's work on a monolithic release cycle and see how it goes. i think things should be easier

[jira] Created: (SM-1090) JBI 1.0 compatibility layer: Offline tool to transform JBI artifacts in OSGi bundles

2007-10-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
JBI 1.0 compatibility layer: Offline tool to transform JBI artifacts in OSGi bundles Key: SM-1090 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1090 Project: Ser