[jira] Reopened: (SM-628) org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlowTest

2007-10-12 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guillaume Nodet reopened SM-628: FYI, we tend to resolve issue when the patches are actually committed (but maybe we should change that

[jira] Resolved: (SM-628) org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlowTest

2007-10-12 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Oleg Zhurakousky resolved SM-628. - Resolution: Fixed I was able to replicate inconsistencies of this and other similar tests and fi

[jira] Commented: (SM-628) org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlowTest

2007-10-12 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40364 ] Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-628: Ok, thx, I missed the point where there are several receivers. I don't have a

[jira] Commented: (SM-628) org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlowTest

2007-10-12 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40363 ] Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-628: - I agree and that was my initial thought to include the timeout logic as part

ServiceMix board report - oct 2007

2007-10-12 Thread Guillaume Nodet
This report for October is the first report since ServiceMix graduation last month. ServiceMix resources have not been moved yet. Hopefully everything will be sorted out soon. We have released our first non incubating version of ServiceMix, the 3.1.2 version, on September 25th.

[jira] Commented: (SM-624) Failed unit test (servicemix-core) : org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.MultipleJMSFlowTest

2007-10-12 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40368 ] Oleg Zhurakousky commented on SM-624: - Can someone please give me quick pointer on this one. This test only has one

[jira] Updated: (SM-1100) Allow containerName to be specified on the command line for projectDeploy

2007-10-12 Thread Brian Greer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brian Greer updated SM-1100: Attachment: mojo-containerName-patch.txt > Allow containerName to be specified on the command line for pro

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SM-628) org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlowTest

2007-10-12 Thread Oleg Zhurakousky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40363 ] ozhurakousky edited comment on SM-628 at 10/12/07 6:23 AM: --- I agree and that was my initia

[jira] Updated: (SM-1100) Allow containerName to be specified on the command line for projectDeploy

2007-10-12 Thread Brian Greer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brian Greer updated SM-1100: Attachment: (was: mojo-containerName-patch.txt) > Allow containerName to be specified on the command l