Re: IRC sessions on ServiceMix 4.0 design (was Re: ServiceMix 4.0)

2007-08-28 Thread Piotr Bzdyl
Hi, I would also like to participate in this session. When are you going to send data about the location of the IRC session? I have also another question: could you recommend any easy in use IRC client (for Windows preferably)? I haven't been using IRC (except one or two times). Best regards,

Re: SecuredBroker and responses

2007-07-12 Thread Piotr Bzdyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like a good idea for me. Piotr Bzdyl wrote: Hi, I am trying to use SecuredBroker but I have one problem with its current implementation. If the user is not authorized to send the exchange do the endpoint, then the SecurityException is thrown and the exchange

[jira] Commented: (SM-999) InOut to InOnly pattern Endpoint for eip-su

2007-07-11 Thread Piotr Bzdyl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39638 ] Piotr Bzdyl commented on SM-999: There is already such a pattern - PipeLine - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix

[jira] Updated: (SM-996) ServiceMix doesn't start correctly due to javax.management.MalformedObjectNameException: Invalid ObjectName value type [javax.xml.namespace.QName]: only ObjectName and String

2007-07-11 Thread Piotr Bzdyl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Piotr Bzdyl updated SM-996: --- Attachment: SM-996.patch.diff This is a simple patch for this. I guess there is another solution (like

Re: Issue SM-966

2007-07-04 Thread Piotr Bzdyl
PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about that, i'm looking at it right now. Btw, how do set the target destination ? Did you override the endpoint and provide your own configuration mechanism ? On 7/4/07, Piotr Bzdyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Do you have any plans to commit the patch from https

Re: Issue SM-966

2007-07-04 Thread Piotr Bzdyl
Thanks! Piotr On 7/4/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I was suspecting something like that. I will commit a slightly modified patch to deal with the interface name too. On 7/4/07, Piotr Bzdyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My custom JmsConsumerMarshaler determines a destination

[jira] Created: (SM-991) servicemix-saxon component lacks ServiceUnit analyzer which results in generating incomplete jbi.xml

2007-06-29 Thread Piotr Bzdyl (JIRA)
/SM-991 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Bug Components: servicemix-saxon Affects Versions: 3.2, incubation Reporter: Piotr Bzdyl Attachments: servicemix-saxon-service-unit-analyzer.diff.txt Due to lack of Service unit analyzer

[jira] Created: (SM-969) JBIMarshaler doesn't copy Subject from NormalizedMessage to SoapMessage

2007-06-20 Thread Piotr Bzdyl (JIRA)
: Bug Components: servicemix-soap Reporter: Piotr Bzdyl Attachments: JBIMarshaler.java.diff JBIMarshaler doesn't copy Subject from NormalizedMessage to SoapMessage so the information about the subject is lost. It does so in opposite way (from SoapMessage

[jira] Created: (SM-963) NullPointerExceptions during JMS component initialization

2007-06-08 Thread Piotr Bzdyl (JIRA)
: servicemix-jms Affects Versions: 3.2, incubation Environment: Windows XP, JDK 1.5.0_11 Reporter: Piotr Bzdyl Attachments: MultiplexingConsumerProcessor.java.patch Currently org.apache.servicemix.jms.AbstractJmsProcessor.start() starts JMS connection (and thus