I have a BPEL SU deploying from a SA and it works good, except I have yet
to get a doc into it. Im sure I will get it..
I followed the servicemix example for the loanbroker BPEL SU. I
dissassembled it
and then created my bpel SU exactly how it was.
hgkrt wrote:
>
> You can find t
You can find the sun bpel engine from
\Your_Sun_APP_Home\addons\jbi-components directory,(use NetBeansIDE6.0M9
installer)
named bpelserviceengine.jar.
Just copy it to ServiceMix3.1 install directory, and start servicemix,
you can see the bpel engine started message.
is this you want to do
I loaded the BPEL engine from Sun APP server.
It deployed and looks like it gonna work..
Gettin ready to test
jbi joe wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way to install netbeans BPEL SE into servicemix 3.1?
> If so, can I get some detailed instructions on doing it?
> I took a l
servicemix-bpe is not supported anymore.
You should give a try to Apache Ode instead.
On 6/26/07, jbi joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way to install netbeans BPEL SE into servicemix 3.1?
If so, can I get some detailed instructions on doing it?
I took a look through the netbea
Ooops, yea I know I left off some tick marks, but u get my drift...
TIA
jbi joe wrote:
>
>
> Is there a way to install netbeans BPEL SE into servicemix 3.1?
> If so, can I get some detailed instructions on doing it?
> I took a look through the netbeans and didnt see any z
Is there a way to install netbeans BPEL SE into servicemix 3.1?
If so, can I get some detailed instructions on doing it?
I took a look through the netbeans and didnt see any zip
files that looked to be in the "JBI component" format.
The reason that I am doing this is because I cann
-broker-bpel example to use Apache Ode
> --
>
> Key: SM-946
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-946
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Task
> Com
Yeah, I think we will have to discuss that.
That's a good idea, but then I think we would need several distributions
maybe.
Another problem would be a release cyclic dependency somehow as ServiceMix
would rely on Ode and Ode relies on ServiceMix dependencies...
On 5/4/07, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PR
Not until there is a release at least.
On 5/4/07, Adrian Co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Does this mean that ServiceMix will bundle the ode jbi installer or will
this be a separate download?
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I have some changes ready to commit to upgrade the loan-br
On 5/3/07, Adrian Co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this mean that ServiceMix will bundle the ode jbi installer or will
this be a separate download?
I think as soon as we have an official Apache Ode incubator release, it
could be bundled with ServiceMix.
alex
Hi,
Does this mean that ServiceMix will bundle the ode jbi installer or will
this be a separate download?
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I have some changes ready to commit to upgrade the loan-broker-bpel
example
from the ServiceMix distribution to Apache Ode instead of our deprecated
servicemix
+1 :)
On 5/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have some changes ready to commit to upgrade the loan-broker-bpel
example
from the ServiceMix distribution to Apache Ode instead of our deprecated
servicemix-bpe SE. I think we should make this change in both trunk and
3.1
I have some changes ready to commit to upgrade the loan-broker-bpel example
from the ServiceMix distribution to Apache Ode instead of our deprecated
servicemix-bpe SE. I think we should make this change in both trunk and
3.1 branch before releasing 3.1.1.
Does everyone agree or is there any
Upgrade loan-broker-bpel example to use Apache Ode
--
Key: SM-946
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-946
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Task
Components: servicemix
;
> yhofri wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> i've been trying to use Sun - openESB BPEL SE with servicemix, yet
>> encountered some issues.
>> has anyone done that before ?
>> is servicemix compatible with Sun/openESB and any other JBI Spec.
>> components ?
>
;ve been trying to use Sun - openESB BPEL SE with servicemix, yet
> encountered some issues.
> has anyone done that before ?
> is servicemix compatible with Sun/openESB and any other JBI Spec.
> components ?
> 10x
> hofri
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
Hi,
i've been trying to use Sun - openESB BPEL SE with servicemix, yet
encountered some issues.
has anyone done that before ?
is servicemix compatible with Sun/openESB and any other JBI Spec. components
?
10x
hofri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/integrating-Sun---op
,
isn't it?
> into loan-broker-bpel sample - javax.jbi.messaging.MessagingException: Do not
> understand pattern: null
> --
>
> Key: SM-833
>
, integrated with maven, and use the
[maven-exec-plugin|http://mojo.codehaus.org/exec-maven-plugin/introduction.html]
to be able to launch the client
* just add a few files with an ant script to launch the client (as for the
other bpel example)
I guess the second way would be faster (and maybe
include
this class and start it (and add a line to the README.txt to tell how to launch
this class).
Thanks !
> Add client for loan-broker-bpel
> ---
>
> Key: SM-826
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activem
Hi everybody,
I've seen the bpel-bpe example of servicemix 3.0 snapshot and it works
fine...
But i can't understand what is the role of ActiveMq.
I know, tell me if i'm wrong, that the JMSClient class send a message on tcp
port 61616 and then this message arrive to the bpel tha
The loan-broker-lw-su contains several lightweight components.
One of them is a JmsServiceComponent which receives a JMS
message posted by the client, route it to the bpel process and
send back the response. The bpel process will call several
other components (banks, credit agency) before
Hi Guillaume,
thank you for the explaining.But I have one more question to make
I've seen the bpel-bpe example of servicemix 3.0 snapshot and it works
fine...
But i can't understand what is the role of ActiveMq.
I know, tell me if i'm wrong, that the JMSClient class send a mess
: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=431301&view=rev
Log:
SM-526: Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible
in BPEL
Modified:
incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-bpe/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/bpe/external/JbiInvokeAction.java
> Fault messages retu
NormalizedMessage. The
use of XMLInteractionObject is deprecated within ODE and due to some not
entirely understood code paths this results in Fault messages being wrapped
in a CannedFormattableValue which renders the object immutable in BPEL and its
data unretrieveable to the JBI world when sent back to
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526?page=all ]
Grant McDonald updated SM-526:
--
Attachment: JbiInvokeAction.java.patch
The patch is now ready to go and has been tested to allow BPEL to receive and
manipulate fault messages. As discussed the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526?page=all ]
Grant McDonald updated SM-526:
--
Attachment: (was: servicemix-bpe.zip)
> Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in B
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526?page=comments#action_36762 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-526:
Is this patch ok to apply ? Your last comment seens to indicate it was not
ready ...
> Fault messages returned to BPEL
easier to apply as you only need
to apply one patch file.
> Fault messages returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in BPEL
> -
>
> Key: SM-526
> URL: https://is
ges returned to BPEL via servicemix-bpe are not accessible in BPEL
> -
>
> Key: SM-526
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-526
> Project: ServiceMix
>
Thanks!
I've checked that.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/src-for-BPEL-Example-t1791958.html#a4934663
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
On 6/15/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/06, manuella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm interested in BPEL-Example. And I want to read the source of it.
> Does anyone know, where I can find it?
> Thanks!
Manuella,
My apologies, please disrega
On 6/15/06, manuella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm interested in BPEL-Example. And I want to read the source of it.
Does anyone know, where I can find it?
Thanks!
Manuella,
The source for the Loan Broker BPEL example is available in the
ServiceMix source code. Information on c
I have tried to run the BPEL Example on servicemix-2.0.2.
This example doesn't work...
This is the error message:
D:\Program
Files\servicemix-2.0.2\assembly\target\servicemix-2.0.2\bin\servicemi
x-2.0.2\examples\bpel>servicemix servicemix.xml
ServiceMix ESB: 2.0.2
Loading ServiceMix f
C but the new proposal changes things
slightly (being a new podling) so to clear things up I've called
another vote.
- Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
Sure, we're open to other contributions and co
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote:
Dims & Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE prop
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a uni
Dims & Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS
On 14 Feb 2006, at 01:25, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I think ServiceMix is the perfect home for a BPEL engine. Every
JBI implementation that I am aware of has and integrated
orchestration
engine exposed via the BPEL specification.
If every JBI implementation has an
On 2/13/2006 6:43 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Sybase wants to donate to the service-mix community
In other words, they *don't* want to contribute it to Apache.
They want it to go into a specific and particular niche *at*
Apache. Why the specificity? Why d
40 matches
Mail list logo
