> > something
> > > > > > like
> > > > > >mvn jbi:embedded
> > > > > > which would launch a servicemix configured by a
> servicemix.xmlfile
> > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > root
> which would launch a servicemix configured by a
servicemix.xmlfile
> > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > root dir.
> > > > >
> > > > > The only problem is that examples sometimes need a client which
> must
> > > be
> > > > &g
he
> > > > root dir.
> > > >
> > > > The only problem is that examples sometimes need a client which
must
> > be
> > > > compiled and launched ...
> > > >
> > > > On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently in the process of refactoring / documenting the
> examples
> > > > that ship with ServiceMix distribution.
> > > > ServiceMix has a large set of bindings, service engines
/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm currently in the process of refactoring / documenting the
> > > examples
> > > > that ship with ServiceMix distribution.
> > > > ServiceMix has a large set of bindings, serv
gt; > On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm currently in the process of refactoring / documenting the
examples
> > > that ship with ServiceMix distribution.
> > > ServiceMix has a large set of bindings, service eng
.
> >
> > On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm currently in the process of refactoring / documenting the
> > examples
> > > that ship with ServiceMix distribution.
> > > ServiceMix has a large set of b
; > that ship with ServiceMix distribution.
> > ServiceMix has a large set of bindings, service engines (both standard
> and
> > lightweight), but I have the feeling
> > that we can not put thousands examples in the distribution.
> > I'd rather go with fewer, better docu
