ubject: Re: IDE Recommendations
>
> Some may think I am joking with this question but in reality I am not. I
> am curious as to the number of people out there that do not use IDE's. I
> find that VI and the JDK allow the ultimate flexibility. I have used
> JBuilder, VC and O
I use the JDK and text editors. My glances at IDE's - I'd like to get a convenient
debugger - have given me
the impression that they make coding cumbersome, in return for some assistance
visualizing. Maybe it's my
background as an artist, but for me it's not worth it. I rough out user interface
OTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 1:07 AM
Subject: Re: IDE Recommendations
> Some may think I am joking with this question but in reality I am not. I
am curious as to the number of people out there that do not use IDE's. I
find that VI and the JDK allow the ultimate flexibility. I h
hey guys,
an alternative which some of you might be interested in, is using
x-emacs for (winnt or unix) and use the package jde with it. it gives a
great ide. it an run java apps and applets and jdb as a subprocess in a
frame of xemacs. It also invokes jdb in a frame. It takes a little
tweaking
You may want to look at Ant, since make isn't a very good tool for JAVA
classes/packages IMHO.
Thor HW
- Original Message -
From: Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: IDE Recommendations
> Some m
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: IDE Recommendations
> Some may think I am joking with this question but in reality I am not. I
am curious as to the number of people out there that do not use IDE's. I
find that VI and the JD
From: Ryan
> Some may think I am joking with this question but in reality I am not. I am curious
>as to the number of people out there
> that do not use IDE's. I find that VI and the JDK allow the ultimate flexibility. I
>have used JBuilder, VC and Oracle
> JDeveloper. Am crazy to do it this way
I am with you. And I am doing ok with hat.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2000 12:07 AM
Subject: Re: IDE Recommendations
> Some may think I am joking with this question but in reality I am not. I
a
iginal Message -
>From: Fernando Saldanha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 4:21 PM
>Subject: Re: IDE Recommendations
>
>
> > Take a look at IBM Visual Age for Java. I tried JBuilder and found the IBM
> > product
Some may think I am joking with this question but in reality I am not. I am curious as
to the number of people out there that do not use IDE's. I find that VI and the JDK
allow the ultimate flexibility. I have used JBuilder, VC and Oracle JDeveloper. Am
crazy to do it this way? What's the norm
WebServer
with EJB support). It's for development only.
Thor HW
- Original Message -
From: Fernando Saldanha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: IDE Recommendations
> Take a look at IBM Visual Age for Java.
From: Fernando Saldanha
> Take a look at IBM Visual Age for Java. I tried JBuilder and found the IBM
> product *much* better. And so did some other people at work. I know some
> people who also preferred Visual Cafe 4 (I have not tried it) over JBuilder.
>
> Visual Age's advantages:
>
> 1) Has own
Take a look at IBM Visual Age for Java. I tried JBuilder and found the IBM
product *much* better. And so did some other people at work. I know some
people who also preferred Visual Cafe 4 (I have not tried it) over JBuilder.
Visual Age's advantages:
1) Has own repository, with versioning.
2) Ad
13 matches
Mail list logo
