[sfc-dev] Real problem or misleading exception with mandatory

2016-09-06 Thread Miguel Angel Muñoz Gonzalez
Hi everyone, We are having a problem with this exception when populating data plane locators for service functions at SFC project. Exception in thread "CommitFutures-0" org.opendaylight.netconf.sal.restconf.impl.RestconfDocumentedException: errors: [RestconfError [error-type: application, error

Re: [sfc-dev] [mdsal-dev] Real problem or misleading exception with mandatory

2016-09-06 Thread Robert Varga
On 09/06/2016 11:56 AM, Miguel Angel Muñoz Gonzalez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We are having a problem with this exception when populating data plane > locators for service functions at SFC project. > > > > Exception in thread "CommitFutures-0" > org.opendaylight.netconf.sal.restconf.impl.Res

Re: [sfc-dev] [mdsal-dev] Real problem or misleading exception with mandatory

2016-09-06 Thread Miguel Angel Muñoz Gonzalez
Sure. Here you are. Thanks! 2016-09-06 12:18:31,863 | WARN | ult-dispatcher-4 | ShardDataTree | 196 - org.opendaylight.controller.sal-distributed-datastore - 1.5.0.SNAPSHOT | member-1-shard-default-config: Unexpected failure in validation phase java.lang.IllegalArgumentExcep

Re: [sfc-dev] [mdsal-dev] Real problem or misleading exception with mandatory

2016-09-06 Thread Robert Varga
On 09/06/2016 12:20 PM, Miguel Angel Muñoz Gonzalez wrote: > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Node > (urn:cisco:params:xml:ns:yang:sfc-sf?revision=2014-07-01)sf-data-plane-locator[{(urn:cisco:params:xml:ns:yang:sfc-sf?revision=2014-07-01)name=dpl-101}] > is missing mandatory descendant > /(ur

[sfc-dev] SFC Boron Blocker Bugs

2016-09-06 Thread An Ho
This bug is currently blocking Boron RC3. As reported by Brady Allen Johnson [1], there is a Boron Blocker Bug for SFC related to VPP Renderer integration with Honeycomb. The bug has been assigned to colleagues in Intel China with an ETA of 9/7 morning (GMT+1) and no known workaround exists fo

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC Boron Blocker Bugs

2016-09-06 Thread Brady Johnson
An, Thanks for that, I'll be sure to get the patch merged ASAP. Regards, Brady On Sep 6, 2016 18:30, "An Ho" wrote: > This bug is currently blocking Boron RC3. > > As reported by Brady Allen Johnson [1], there is a Boron Blocker Bug for > SFC related to VPP Renderer integration with Honeycomb

[sfc-dev] Bug 6648 - Not possible to add additional Service Function's dataplane locators

2016-09-06 Thread An Ho
Hi Robert, Brady, During the MDSAL call, some concerns were raised as to whether Bug 6648 is a blocking issue in the Boron release. However, the bugzilla note for the bug indicates it a "normal" with a target of "Boron-SR1" in October. Could we get some clarity on the priority and target for

Re: [sfc-dev] Bug 6648 - Not possible to add additional Service Function's dataplane locators

2016-09-06 Thread Brady Allen Johnson
An, We discovered the root cause of this problem today, with the help of Robert, while investigating a failing Boron SFC Integration test. Originally I wanted to fix this bug in Boron RC3 and marked the bug as so, but after talking to Jamo, he said it would be ok to fix in Boron SR1 without

Re: [sfc-dev] Bug 6648 - Not possible to add additional Service Function's dataplane locators

2016-09-06 Thread An Ho
If the bug is a blocking issue, I'm fine with fixing it in RC3 since we will be respinning a new build and a patch is already available. If the patch has been tested/confirmed that it does not adversely affect dependent projects and does not introduce any new regression on functionality, please

Re: [sfc-dev] Bug 6648 - Not possible to add additional Service Function's dataplane locators

2016-09-06 Thread Brady Allen Johnson
An, I just cherry-picked the change to stable/boron [0] The SFC testing contact, Miguel Angel Muñoz Gonzalez, has verified that the change does not introduce any regressions, and that dependent project will not be adversely affected. Regards, Brady [0] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#

Re: [sfc-dev] Bug 6648 - Not possible to add additional Service Function's dataplane locators

2016-09-06 Thread Brady Johnson
An, The patch verified in stable/boron successfully and I +2'd it, but I can't merge it. I guess the branch is locked. How should I proceed? Brady On Sep 6, 2016 20:00, "Brady Allen Johnson" < brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com> wrote: > An, > > I just cherry-picked the change to stable/boron [0]

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC-103 SF NSH aware

2016-09-06 Thread Alioune
Thanks Patricio this really help. I've a few more questions : How to decode NSH header in SFs nodes with tcpdump or wireshark ? Is it possible to rewrite NSH header as iptables does for IP packets ? Regards, On 6 September 2016 at 04:09, Patricio Latini wrote: > Here you have the procedure (no

Re: [sfc-dev] Bug 6648 - Not possible to add additional Service Function's dataplane locators

2016-09-06 Thread An Ho
The patch 45264 has been merged. After RC3, the stable/boron branches are locked, so projects should +2 their patches and the release team will merge the patches after review. Best Regards, An Ho From: Brady Johnson [mailto:bradyallenjohn...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 11:58 AM

[sfc-dev] Issues is Carbon distribution

2016-09-06 Thread Luis Gomez
Couple of them: 1) SFC feature odl-sfc-ios-xe-renderer was generating OutOfMemory ERRORs in distribution SingleFeature test. This was slowing down distribution-check jobs for more than 1 hour. Feature has been removed through this patch so it should be fine now: https://git.opendaylight.org/ge

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC Boron Blocker Bugs

2016-09-06 Thread Brady Allen Johnson
An, The patch [0] is ready in stable/boron, and I just +2'd it. Can you arrange to have it merged, please. Thanks, Brady [0] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/45283/ On 06/09/16 18:52, Brady Johnson wrote: An, Thanks for that, I'll be sure to get the patch merged ASAP. Regards,