Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mag coverage

2007-09-10 Thread Dennis Hayes
Thanks! Dennis Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hawt diggity dog, thats awesome... On 9/10/07, Dennis Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Here is the correction I am printing in this month's issue, The URL ( http://sharpos.org/) I listed last month for the SharpOS

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mag coverage

2007-09-10 Thread Bruce
hawt diggity dog, thats awesome... On 9/10/07, Dennis Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here is the correction I am printing in this month's issue, > >The URL (http://sharpos.org/) I listed last month for the > SharpOS project's (a managed OS written almost entirely in C#) Web s

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Lurkers and actives alike: Licensing?

2007-09-10 Thread Darx Kies
An interesting reading. http://www.itwire.com/content/view/14361/1090/ Especially the ending. "I like the GPL because it imposes accountability, something which people always seem to avoid like the plague - and these days it has reached pandemic proportions. And the GPL is neither against capi

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Mag coverage

2007-09-10 Thread Dennis Hayes
Here is the correction I am printing in this month's issue, The URL (http://sharpos.org/) I listed last month for the SharpOS project’s (a managed OS written almost entirely in C#) Web site is no longer valid. The other URL I listed, http://sharpos.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/tr

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Lurkers and actives alike: Licensing?

2007-09-10 Thread JaeHyun Roh
IMO, I think it would be good to choose a GPL or LGPL license. though I'm not throughly knowing the license thing, but if we choose the GPL then codebase for ours can be used by other developers to make another great software. and we can prevent this code to be used secretly from some commercial