[SharpOS Developers] Swedish keymap

Hello! I hope i'm doing this the right way, I'm not really used to this mailing-list thing. I've made a patch adding the swedish keymap. I think I got most things right but the keymap parser is a tad on the buggy side =) I see you have a bug open for that, maybe I'll engage in fixing it if noone e

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hardware Abstraction

Darx Kies wrote: > Bruce Markham wrote: > >> [...] >> > They are pretty much the same. IntPtr is actually just a struct with a > void* field. > void* might be faster when AOTing but with IntPtr/UIntPtr you have all > the methods and properties you might need. > Both can be boxed and so on

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hardware Abstraction

Bruce Markham wrote: > On Feb 3, 2008 10:14 PM, TraumaPony <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > With regard to: > "Another miscellaneous food for thought is pointer usage. If you > are writing code against the architecture, or against memory, that > requires

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Threading patch

Hey david, I wrote a gdb client for .net (just having major issues with decoding the g command) for cosmos. You are more than welcome to copy 'n paste :). However, i suggest you upstream it because i will be adding debug symbol support to it soon! Jonathan On 2/2/08, David Stetz <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Threading patch

Hey david, I wrote a gdb client for .net (just having major issues with decoding the g command) for cosmos. You are more than welcome to copy 'n paste :). However, i suggest you upstream it because i will be adding debug symbol support to it soon! Jonathan On 2/2/08, David Stetz <[EMAIL PROTECT

[SharpOS Developers] Cursor movements and insert\overwrite console modes

Hi all! I have found some TODO remarks in Console.cs : /// TODO /// - typing in command /// - move left/right in command /// - insert overwrite You can find changed files in attachment. I have added new method to StringBuilder called Insert and made som

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hardware Abstraction

Ah ok, that's pretty cool.. so at least we won't have to worry about that ;) On Feb 4, 2008 10:43 AM, Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PCI is standardised, it always expects the same endianess (which is > freaken cool!)... But I'm sure other devices could cause headaches. -

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hardware Abstraction

PCI is standardised, it always expects the same endianess (which is freaken cool!)... But I'm sure other devices could cause headaches. On 04/02/2008, Sander van Rossen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we need to stop using 'uint' just because we are assuming we are working on > > 32-bit x86. " voi

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hardware Abstraction

> we need to stop using 'uint' just because we are assuming we are working on > 32-bit x86. " void* " exists for a > reason... Which reminds me, we also have to be carefull with endianess.. I wonder if a pci device on a pc expects data in a different endianess compared to, for instance, the same

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Waitforenter() Patch in Console.CS

On Feb 4, 2008 8:17 AM, Liam Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a small patch that is quite hacky. > > What it does, is change a bool called 'iswaiting' to false, and then has a > couple of if's in the keyboard handler, that basically say, 'if it's not > waiting, do whatever you normally

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Hardware Abstraction

..Sounds a lot like the designs/ starting implementation that i already wrote ;) On Feb 4, 2008 1:33 AM, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... So in the end, we need to agree more on our process > than our approach - because we will probably end up completely refactoring a > few times. (A