Me neither. :)
Chriss.
2008/4/7, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In concurrence with grover, if possible, partial classes to group up
> related portions. (I usually use an extra period in the filename so that all
> such related files are prefixed the same.)
>
> But I personally have no pr
The questions were rather "if" and "why" than "how".
Chriss.
2008/4/7, grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Use the partial feature in C# and group things, which belong together.
>
> Michael (aka grover)
>
>
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auft
In concurrence with grover, if possible, partial classes to group up related
portions. (I usually use an extra period in the filename so that all such
related files are prefixed the same.)
But I personally have no problem with the "huge" generated files...
-
Use the partial feature in C# and group things, which belong together.
Michael (aka grover)
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Mircea-Cristian Racasan
Gesendet: Montag, 7. April 2008 00:42
An: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
B
Hi
As I am working on improving the x86 encoding towards JIT and so on and as
there were some rantings about the huge generated files, I want to ask you
guys if you want like many many small files or only one big file as is now
for the generated stuff?
Chriss.
Perhaps we should convene a meeting to discuss the state of SharpOS
and help coordinate development. In the past we've had meetings on
Saturday at 1800/1900 UTC ... does this sound good for our current
bunch of interested parties?
Preliminary topics (please discuss additions/changes):
* Logging: w
