There is another SharpOS meeting today. There are two sessions, both
having the same initial agenda. One is at 1800 GMT (1 PM EST) and
another at 2200 GMT (5 PM EST).
Since the last meeting was very long, this one will probably be pretty
short. I have been pretty busy and have failed to come up wi
Here are the revised meeting notes that I took during our meeting on
Saturday. It was a very long meeting (about six hours) but we
discussed many important issues. The full log for the meeting is
available in the Sharpbot logs at:
http://sharpos.org/logs/?channel=sharpos&date=2008.4.12
I've got b
Please join us at #sharpos on freenode IRC for today's meeting!
Sharpbot is active and logs are being sent to http://sharpos.org/logs
--
fury
long name: William Lahti
handle :: fury
freenode :: xfury
blog :: http://xfurious.blogspot.com/
-
See you all then :)
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Stanisław Pitucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Mircea-Cristian Racasan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will be there!
> I will be there! ++
>
>
>
> --
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Mircea-Cristian Racasan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will be there!
I will be there! ++
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Register now and save $200. Hurry,
I will be there!
Chriss.
2008/4/7, William Lahti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Perhaps we should convene a meeting to discuss the state of SharpOS
> and help coordinate development. In the past we've had meetings on
> Saturday at 1800/1900 UTC ... does this sound good for our current
> bunch of intere
Perhaps we should convene a meeting to discuss the state of SharpOS
and help coordinate development. In the past we've had meetings on
Saturday at 1800/1900 UTC ... does this sound good for our current
bunch of interested parties?
Preliminary topics (please discuss additions/changes):
* Logging: w
hmm, okay, thanks.. too bad it's not the entire conversation.. sounds
like good stuff nevertheless ;)
Can't wait untill i have time to help out again.
But as far as i can see i'll be working here in purgatory untill the
end of december, after that i'll have spare time again which i can
then devote
Sander van Rossen wrote:
> Oops, completely missed the meeting... can anyone post the log of the
> meeting?
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 3:45 AM, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From reading the log, and stopping by to say my own 2 cents, I
> > gather that the meeting was a good success!
>
Oops, completely missed the meeting... can anyone post the log of the meeting?
On Dec 9, 2007 3:45 AM, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From reading the log, and stopping by to say my own 2 cents, I gather that
> the meeting was a good success!
-
>From reading the log, and stopping by to say my own 2 cents, I gather that
the meeting was a good success!
I'm already working on a more sophisticated RuntimeCop that we will be able
to use to list method/property stubs that we need to implement, as well as
types that we need to be able to mars
It is okay with me. Please attend if you are able to so we can make
the best decisions for everyone's future SharpOS!
On Dec 7, 2007 5:48 AM, Darx Kies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruce Markham wrote:
> > Correction to my comment on personal availability: 9:00 PM GMT = 21:00
> > GMT, which actu
Bruce Markham wrote:
> Correction to my comment on personal availability: 9:00 PM GMT = 21:00
> GMT, which actually equals 4:00 PM EST. If anyone else would prefer
> earlier, I would do better either 1.0 or 1.5 hours earlier,
> personally. Otherwise, I'll just read my IRC log and then spam the
Correction to my comment on personal availability: 9:00 PM GMT = 21:00 GMT,
which actually equals 4:00 PM EST. If anyone else would prefer earlier, I
would do better either 1.0 or 1.5 hours earlier, personally. Otherwise, I'll
just read my IRC log and then spam the mailing list afterwards... ;-P
--
I've updated
http://sharpos.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/wiki/IRCMeetings
If any of you have other thoughts for this upcoming meeting, please post
them.
If you can't attend the meeting, but have been active in the project within
the last few months, feel free to take a couple minutes to write
On Dec 6, 2007 12:50 PM, Darx Kies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now that we have a new AOT and a kernel that works with both .NET and
> mono,
> we should have a meeting again soon.
The kernel can compile and AOT under mono again? Does this mean we can tempt
xfury back into play? ;-)
> W
Hi
Now that we have a new AOT and a kernel that works with both .NET and mono,
we should have a meeting again soon.
What about this Saturday 9:00pm GMT?
We need to talk about moving the new AOT to trunk, runtime type
informating implementation,
what is needed for the first relase and some other
I'm at work, as usual. But I am thinking about taking a dip back into
SharpOS. See seperate e-mail for more info...
On 7/21/07, William Lahti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're gathering in the ##sharpos room at IRC-- please come if you can
make it... it was supposed to be 19:30 but not many peo
We're gathering in the ##sharpos room at IRC-- please come if you can
make it... it was supposed to be 19:30 but not many people showed up.
It's actually now 20:16. Sorry if my fumbling of the US timezones
confused anyone.
--
fury
long name: William Lahti
handle :: fury
freenode :: xfury
blog ::
19 matches
Mail list logo
