ff for
us!!! They seem to be a lot further than we are!
Jonathan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:sharpos-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maciej Jagiello
> Sent: 11 December 2007 12:51 AM
> To: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject:
r 2007 12:51 AM
> To: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [SharpOS Developers] licensing again
>
> Where do we stand in licensing issues. I see GPL in trac and code, but
> is it
> a final decision? A GPL+LGPL combination or such? I'll commit code as
> lo
We have done that greatest job at documenting or advertising it, (I think
only an e-mail or two...), but we have settled on GPL v3.0 with the
Classpath Linking Exception for Libraries.
As the original post in this thread says, the text for that license is now
supposedly on the Wiki. (/me not willi
Where do we stand in licensing issues. I see GPL in trac and code, but is it
a final decision? A GPL+LGPL combination or such? I'll commit code as long
as a free open source license (as defined by FSF) is chosen obviously, but I
must be sure before I use(eventually) any existing code out there.
For
