Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2008-01-02 Thread William Lahti
On Jan 2, 2008 2:12 PM, Freyr Magnússon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd suggest to tag the trunk when stabilizing for a release. Then work > directly on the tag to stabilize and merge patches back to the trunk. That > way trunk development does not have to stop while wrapping up the last > issue

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2008-01-02 Thread Freyr Magnússon
I'd suggest to tag the trunk when stabilizing for a release. Then work directly on the tag to stabilize and merge patches back to the trunk. That way trunk development does not have to stop while wrapping up the last issues for the release. regards, Freyr On Dec 30, 2007 10:15 PM, Bruce Markham

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
One small edit to the autoprops: [miscellany] enable-auto-props = yes ### Section for configuring automatic properties. [auto-props] ### The format of the entries is: ### file-name-pattern = propname[=value][;propname[=value]...] ### The file-name-pattern can contain wildcards (such as '*' and

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread William Lahti
I have a feeling you will also need the 'miscellany' section I posted, as that looks like it is just based on the stock SVN client and has the same config syntax. Cool :) On Dec 30, 2007 8:12 PM, Bruce Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 30, 2007 7:45 PM, William Lahti <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Bruce Markham
On Dec 30, 2007 7:45 PM, William Lahti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um please do _NOT_ commit all your sandboxes! If anything we are > trying to _stabilize_ the codebase! Release is coming soon let's not > break anything! Maybe by "clean" he meant just making sure we deleted old stuff? *shru

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread William Lahti
Um please do _NOT_ commit all your sandboxes! If anything we are trying to _stabilize_ the codebase! Release is coming soon let's not break anything! As for line endings: yeah it's gotten quite annoying because if you actually make a change in the editor, then remove what you added, it will le

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Bruce Markham
Having no experience with the command-line subversion tool, I can't seem to lock anything from work. If I target the repo, its says that I need to target a file. And if I target my local working copy, it says that it isn't a working copy. (I suspect again that it means I have to do a file-by-file l

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Bruce Markham
I'll see what I can do... - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/_

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
I think someone needs to svn lock the trunk and make all the changes... -- Jonathan Dickinson - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
Bruce Markham wrote: > Heh, actually, subversion does. But as best as I can tell, its a > per-file property. :-( I'll do some research on this before I mess > with any line-endings. > > Visual Studio has gotten really annoying about line-endings, it keeps > asking me if I want it to fix them,

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Bruce Markham
Heh, actually, subversion does. But as best as I can tell, its a per-file property. :-( I'll do some research on this before I mess with any line-endings. Visual Studio has gotten really annoying about line-endings, it keeps asking me if I want it to fix them, and I say 'no', but I don't click 'do

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
Bruce Markham wrote: > As far as I understand, there is no difference between .img and .iso > in such a way that the file extensions would suggest. The real > question you should be asking is, do we think we can release a disk > image with a filesystem more appropriate for optical media... > >

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Dennis Hayes
This might be a goo dtime to lose history and clean things up. When I was in charge of Mono's Winforms we had this problem *bad*. The way I dealt with it was to have a check in with nothing but line changes, so if someone had old code that needed comparing, they could compare aginst the old

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread Bruce Markham
As far as I understand, there is no difference between .img and .iso in such a way that the file extensions would suggest. The real question you should be asking is, do we think we can release a disk image with a filesystem more appropriate for optical media... And yes, we can reformat pre-existin

Re: [SharpOS Developers] Last remaining issue

2007-12-30 Thread William Lahti
Once the code is finalized for release I do plan to throw together an ISO to make it easier to test on PCs that do not have floppy drives (most of them nowadays--- actually no computer that I have that runs has one :-P) On Dec 30, 2007 3:32 PM, Jonathan Chayce Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: