Re: [sheepdog] [PATCH] dog: fix to calculate a resizable max VDI size appropriately

2015-02-11 Thread Liu Yuan
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:53:44PM +0900, Teruaki Ishizaki wrote: A resizable max VDI size was fixed value, 4TB. So, when block_size_shift was specified more than 22, resizing VDI size over 4TB caused error. This patch enables to calculate a resizable max VDI properly. Signed-off-by:

[sheepdog] [PATCH] dog: fix to calculate a resizable max VDI size appropriately

2015-02-10 Thread Teruaki Ishizaki
A resizable max VDI size was fixed value, 4TB. So, when block_size_shift was specified more than 22, resizing VDI size over 4TB caused error. This patch enables to calculate a resizable max VDI properly. Signed-off-by: Teruaki Ishizaki ishizaki.teru...@lab.ntt.co.jp --- dog/vdi.c | 24

Re: [sheepdog] [PATCH] dog: fix to calculate a resizable max VDI size appropriately

2015-02-10 Thread Liu Yuan
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:53:44PM +0900, Teruaki Ishizaki wrote: A resizable max VDI size was fixed value, 4TB. Why we max VDI size is 4TB if we have object size more than 4MB? I remember in the past max size is 4TB because object is 4MB. Thanks Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list

Re: [sheepdog] [PATCH] dog: fix to calculate a resizable max VDI size appropriately

2015-02-10 Thread Teruaki Ishizaki
(2015/02/10 18:01), Liu Yuan wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:53:44PM +0900, Teruaki Ishizaki wrote: A resizable max VDI size was fixed value, 4TB. Why we max VDI size is 4TB if we have object size more than 4MB? I remember in the past max size is 4TB because object is 4MB. Sorry for