On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 01:09:02PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:47:07 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:56:34AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > Current subcommands of "dog vdi cache" can cause segmentation faults
> > > because they don't check
At Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:47:07 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:56:34AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > Current subcommands of "dog vdi cache" can cause segmentation faults
> > because they don't check an index of argv.
> >
>
> I tried every subcommand for 'vdi cache' and don
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:56:34AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> Current subcommands of "dog vdi cache" can cause segmentation faults
> because they don't check an index of argv.
>
I tried every subcommand for 'vdi cache' and don't get the segfault, which
exactly commond cause the segfalt?
Than
Current subcommands of "dog vdi cache" can cause segmentation faults
because they don't check an index of argv.
Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake
---
dog/vdi.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dog/vdi.c b/dog/vdi.c
index c716589..b6c955c 1
