At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> @@ -861,6 +885,7 @@ static void recover_object_main(struct work *work)
>
> finish_recovery(rinfo);
> out:
> + rinfo->running_threads_nr--;
> free_recovery_obj_work(row);
> }
This can cause a segfault because rinfo may be
At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:51:02 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:42:56PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:44:06 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +080
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:42:56PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:44:06 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 0
At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:44:06 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +080
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 0
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 0
At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:17:16 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +080
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 0
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:11:43AM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:53:27 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:04:15PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:38:34 +0900,
> > > Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014
At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:53:27 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:04:15PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:38:34 +0900,
> > Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > >
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:29:03 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:04:15PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:38:34 +0900,
> Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> >
> > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:29:03 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:38:34PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:29:03 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 0
At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:38:34 +0900,
Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:29:03 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:0
At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:29:03 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +080
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 0
At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:14:56 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:28:35PM +090
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:28:35PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 05:01:52PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:28:35PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > > At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800
At Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:53:57 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:28:35PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800,
> > > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rationale for multi-threaded recove
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:32:34PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:28:35PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800,
> > Liu Yuan wrote:
> > >
> > > Rationale for multi-threaded recovery:
> > >
> > > 1. If one node is added, we find that all the VMs
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 04:28:35PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> >
> > Rationale for multi-threaded recovery:
> >
> > 1. If one node is added, we find that all the VMs on other nodes will get
> >noticeably affected until 50% data is tra
At Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:01:42 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> Rationale for multi-threaded recovery:
>
> 1. If one node is added, we find that all the VMs on other nodes will get
>noticeably affected until 50% data is transferred to the new node.
>
> 2. For node failure, we might not have problems
Rationale for multi-threaded recovery:
1. If one node is added, we find that all the VMs on other nodes will get
noticeably affected until 50% data is transferred to the new node.
2. For node failure, we might not have problems of running VM but the
recovery process boost will benefit IO op
23 matches
Mail list logo