Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-28 Thread Markus Armbruster
Please accept my sincere apologies for taking so long to reply. A few thoughts before I dig deeper. Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes: > Hi all! > > At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look > at it. Cover as much as possible, except inserting macro invocation >

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-28 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
28.11.2019 11:54, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Please accept my sincere apologies for taking so long to reply. A few > thoughts before I dig deeper. > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes: > >> Hi all! >> >> At the request of Markus: full version of errp propagation. Let's look >> at it. Cover

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-28 Thread Markus Armbruster
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes: > 28.11.2019 11:54, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Please accept my sincere apologies for taking so long to reply. A few >> thoughts before I dig deeper. >> >> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> At the request of Markus: full version

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-20 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 20.11.2019 um 13:59 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 11/20/19 3:50 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > Okay... > > > > I think that: > > > > 1. A lot of efforts (not only my, I think reviewing is already exceeded > > generation efforts) > > are made, it would be sad to lose them.

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-20 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/20/19 3:50 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: Okay... I think that: 1. A lot of efforts (not only my, I think reviewing is already exceeded generation efforts) are made, it would be sad to lose them. 2. It's safe enough to apply only part of generated patches: we just fix

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-20 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Okay... I think that: 1. A lot of efforts (not only my, I think reviewing is already exceeded generation efforts) are made, it would be sad to lose them. 2. It's safe enough to apply only part of generated patches: we just fix error_abort/error_fatal in more popular subsystems, what's

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-13 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
12.11.2019 16:46, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:57:25 +0400 > Marc-André Lureau wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy >> wrote: >>> >>> Finally, what is the plan? >>> >>> Markus what do you think? >>> >>> Now a lot of patches are

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-12 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:57:25 +0400 Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > wrote: > > > > Finally, what is the plan? > > > > Markus what do you think? > > > > Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not. > > > > Is there any

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-08 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:31 PM Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > Finally, what is the plan? > > Markus what do you think? > > Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not. > > Is there any hope that all patches will be reviewed? Should I resend the > whole series, or may be

Re: [sheepdog] [RFC v5 000/126] error: auto propagated local_err

2019-11-08 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Finally, what is the plan? Markus what do you think? Now a lot of patches are reviewed, but a lot of are not. Is there any hope that all patches will be reviewed? Should I resend the whole series, or may be reduce it to reviewed subsystems only? 11.10.2019 19:03, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy