Thanks.
I was under the mistaken impression that the the token format is sort of
cast in stone. And for some time was confused by the differing formats
between
BlobCrypter and BasicCrypter!
Amit
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Brian Eaton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Amit Mur
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Amit Murthy wrote:
> Could someone please explain why the BlobCrypterSecurityToken does not
> return the actual AppId? And why isn't the AppId part of the encrypted
> token?
Can you can extend that token in arbitrary ways; if you want to
distinguish between app-id
Hi,
Could someone please explain why the BlobCrypterSecurityToken does not
return the actual AppId? And why isn't the AppId part of the encrypted
token?
Code snippet from BlobCrypterSecurityToken.java
// Legacy value for signed fetch, opensocial 0.8 prefers
opensocial_app_url
public String g
3 matches
Mail list logo
