Actually rfc 3339 is based off ISO 8601 which support truncated/partial
dates.
You might be thinking of xsd date formats which are more strictly defined.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:20 AM, Sean Lin wrote:
> According to the specs, the datetime format should be based on RFC3339,
>
According to the specs, the datetime format should be based on RFC3339,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt.
But canonicaldb.json gives dates as -MM-dd for certain fields like
"birthday", "endDate", "startDate" but for certain fields like "updated", it
is in the right format.
Why?
2 matches
Mail list logo
