Am 27.07.2012 21:23, schrieb Hartmut Goebel:
> "Convince me" is not such a good argument if you want to attract
> developers :-\
I mean: "Convince me why I should follow the standard" is not such a
good argument if you want to attract developers :-\
"Convince me" on some other topic should be ok
Am 27.07.2012 09:43, schrieb nap:
> And I don't plan to add them unless someone explain me why it's a good
> idea to put a explanation about a function between the prototype and
> the code. We need the explanation before the prototype, and we need to
> see the
Doc-strings are the Python way to do
Le 27/07/2012 11:18, DEGREMONT Aurelien a écrit :
Le 27/07/2012 09:43, nap a écrit :
And I don't plan to add them unless someone explain me why it's a good idea to put a explanation about a function
between the prototype and the code.
All automatic tool looking for python documentation expect
Le 27/07/2012 09:43, nap a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Hartmut Goebel mailto:h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com>>
wrote:
Am 26.07.2012 17 :04, schrieb Timo Veith:
> is there a code documentation or any plans on doing so?
Prior to using a tool like sphinx, we need to add
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Hartmut Goebel <
h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com> wrote:
> Am 26.07.2012 17:04, schrieb Timo Veith:
> > is there a code documentation or any plans on doing so?
>
> Prior to using a tool like sphinx, we need to add usual doc-strings.
> Currently often comments are put
Am 26.07.2012 17:04, schrieb Timo Veith:
> is there a code documentation or any plans on doing so?
Prior to using a tool like sphinx, we need to add usual doc-strings.
Currently often comments are put in front of the function/method/class,
but decent doc-strings are missing. See issue #99.
Unfort
Hi,
is there a code documentation or any plans on doing so?
Like e.g. with sphinx?
timo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Kryptografische Unterschrift
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover
