Re: [Shorewall-users] FAQ 2b ...

2011-02-25 Thread Tom Eastep
On 2/25/11 12:18 PM, Paolo Andretta wrote: > On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Tom Eastep wrote: > > Ok, Changed in: > > vmbr0 192.168.109.0/241.2.3.109 > vmbr0 192.168.110.0/241.2.3.110 > vmbr0 192.168.108.0/241.2.3.108 > > vmbr9 192.168.109.0

Re: [Shorewall-users] FAQ 2b ...

2011-02-25 Thread Paolo Andretta
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Tom Eastep wrote: >>> Apparently you have since it doesn't work. But until you show us what >>> you have done, we can't tell you what you are missing. >>> >>> Things to check: >>> >>> a) That you have set 'routeback' on the internal firewall interface. >>> b) That you have add

Re: [Shorewall-users] FAQ 2b ...

2011-02-25 Thread Tom Eastep
On 2/25/11 11:30 AM, Paolo Andretta wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Tom Eastep wrote: > Would something roughly as documented here: http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq2 help? >>> >>> As in the subject and in my explanation (my english is poor but hope >>> unsterstandable), I read Faq 2 an

Re: [Shorewall-users] FAQ 2b ...

2011-02-25 Thread Paolo Andretta
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Tom Eastep wrote: >>> Would something roughly as documented here: >>> http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq2 help? >> >> As in the subject and in my explanation (my english is poor but hope >> unsterstandable), I read Faq 2 and related docs. I missed something? > > Apparently y

Re: [Shorewall-users] Multi-ISP and internal VLANs results in Martians

2011-02-25 Thread Dorian Kind
Hi, I was finally able to capture some packets on the external interface. The following is what happens when I try to establish a http connection to sony.co.jp from the machine 10.0.99.99 inside the 'test' zone (the zone that contains the VLAN). x.x.x.42 is the IP of the external interface, 00:1b

Re: [Shorewall-users] A can't Ping B until C has pinged A (ipv6)

2011-02-25 Thread Tom Eastep
On 2/25/11 3:04 AM, shorewall shorewall wrote: > Any ideas what I should check? I'll give you the same advice that I give everyone else. When installing IPv6, you should install Shorewall and Shorewall6 *last* after IPv6 is working. Given that IPv6 has no need for NAT, Shorewall6 is not required

Re: [Shorewall-users] A can't Ping B until C has pinged A (ipv6)

2011-02-25 Thread shorewall shorewall
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Dominic Benson wrote: > On 25/02/11 11:04, shorewall shorewall wrote: > > I have two Debian 6 x64 VMs running under ESXi4.1_U1. One of the VMs is > acting as an ipv4 and ipv6 firewall/router using shorewall and has three > virtual NICs, LAN, WAN and DMZ. I've set

Re: [Shorewall-users] A can't Ping B until C has pinged A (ipv6)

2011-02-25 Thread Dominic Benson
On 25/02/11 11:04, shorewall shorewall wrote: I have two Debian 6 x64 VMs running under ESXi4.1_U1. One of the VMs is acting as an ipv4 and ipv6 firewall/router using shorewall and has three virtual NICs, LAN, WAN and DMZ. I've set up a 6in4 ipv6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric on the router but

[Shorewall-users] A can't Ping B until C has pinged A (ipv6)

2011-02-25 Thread shorewall shorewall
I have two Debian 6 x64 VMs running under ESXi4.1_U1. One of the VMs is acting as an ipv4 and ipv6 firewall/router using shorewall and has three virtual NICs, LAN, WAN and DMZ. I've set up a 6in4 ipv6 tunnel from Hurricane Electric on the router but have a peculiar problem. The router can ping ipv6

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic should be dropped but goes through

2011-02-25 Thread Vieri Di Paola
--- On Thu, 2/24/11, Tom Eastep wrote: > > So this should fail (DROP) but it doesn't: > > > > ping 192.168.144.90  (from 192.168.211.39) > > Looks like br0 is the 'net' zone and the implicit > net->net policy is > ACCEPT. If you don't want that, you need to add an explicit > net->net > polic