Re: [Shorewall-users] Trying to make Simple TC work - something's missing

2011-05-05 Thread Tom Eastep
On May 5, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. wrote: >> I have found that if I put an OUT-BANDWIDTH in tcinterface which is low >> enough, then it is easier to observe if traffic control works, > > I just caught this mid-thread, so if this isn't relevant please ignore. >

Re: [Shorewall-users] Trying to make Simple TC work - something's missing

2011-05-05 Thread Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
> I have found that if I put an OUT-BANDWIDTH in tcinterface which is low > enough, then it is easier to observe if traffic control works, I just caught this mid-thread, so if this isn't relevant please ignore. I spent most of my time with traffic control fine tuning the outbound bandwidth par

[Shorewall-users] Shorewall 4.4.19.2

2011-05-05 Thread Tom Eastep
Shorewall 4.4.19.2 is now available for download. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E 4.4.19.2 1) In Shor

Re: [Shorewall-users] Trying to make Simple TC work - something's missing

2011-05-05 Thread lanas
On Tue, 3 May 2011 20:07:52 -0400, lanas wrote : > I have tried with 4.4.19.1 and the problem still remains. The laptop > has two wget instances (ports 80 and 3000) fetching a 500MB file from > the server: > >laptop <-> eth2 router eth1 <-> HTTP server I have found that if I put an OU

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic shaping peculiarities

2011-05-05 Thread Tom Eastep
On 05/05/2011 03:49 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote: >> 4. >> tcdevices >> 0ff:eth0 ... >> ifb0 >> >> ifb0 is allocated "100" (hex) which is against the pre-defined limits >> (0-ff). That, in turn, screws up the tcfilters statements completely >> (they are simply ignored and everything is "routed" thr

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic shaping peculiarities

2011-05-05 Thread Mr Dash Four
> 1. When tcdevices is defined, but tcrules/tcfilters and tclasses are > empty shorewall compiles everything (without complaining!) and when it > (re)starts the whole network grinds to a screeching halt - no packets > in or out. I had a similar issue with this a while ago, which I > thought, w

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic shaping peculiarities

2011-05-05 Thread Tom Eastep
On May 5, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> The problem has been corrected. >> > OK, I'll download it again then. Will test this later this evening and > will let you know. Thanks. I'm going to be out of town for several days and won't have much time for Shorewall. So if there are i

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic shaping peculiarities

2011-05-05 Thread Mr Dash Four
> The problem has been corrected. > OK, I'll download it again then. Will test this later this evening and will let you know. -- WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehens

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic shaping peculiarities

2011-05-05 Thread Tom Eastep
On 05/05/2011 07:14 AM, Tom Eastep wrote: >> Okay -- it is available at >> http://ipv6.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4/shorewall-4.4.19.2/ >> >> PS -- that site also has an IPv4 address. > > Please hold off on testing this. There seems to have been an operator > error during the buil

Re: [Shorewall-users] traffic shaping peculiarities

2011-05-05 Thread Tom Eastep
On May 4, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On May 4, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: > >> >> I will upload a new 4.4.19.2 preview that I believe corrects these issues. >> Please stand by. >> > > Okay -- it is available at > http://ipv6.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4